
Turion 64 X2 TL-64 vs Celeron M 540

Turion 64 X2 TL-64

Celeron M 540
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Turion 64 X2 TL-64 is positioned at rank 361 and the Celeron M 540 is on rank 873, so the Turion 64 X2 TL-64 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Turion 64 X2 TL-64
Performance Per Dollar Celeron M 540
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Turion 64 X2 TL-64 | Celeron M 540 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Trinidad (2006−2007) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Turion 64 X2 TL-64 | Celeron M 540 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Turion 64 X2 TL-64 and Celeron M 540

Turion 64 X2 TL-64
The Turion 64 X2 TL-64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Trinidad (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,726 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron M 540
The Celeron M 540 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.86 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,744 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Turion 64 X2 TL-64 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron M 540 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Turion 64 X2 TL-64 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Turion 64 X2 TL-64 versus 1.86 GHz on the Celeron M 540 — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Turion 64 X2 TL-64. The Turion 64 X2 TL-64 uses the Trinidad (2006−2007) architecture (65 nm), while the Celeron M 540 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Turion 64 X2 TL-64 scores 1,726 against the Celeron M 540's 1,744 — a 1% lead for the Celeron M 540.
| Feature | Turion 64 X2 TL-64 | Celeron M 540 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2+100% | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz+18% | 1.86 GHz |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Process | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Trinidad (2006−2007) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| PassMark | 1,726 | 1,744+1% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Turion 64 X2 TL-64) / false (Celeron M 540). Direct competitor: Celeron M 540 rivals Mobile Sempron 3600+.
| Feature | Turion 64 X2 TL-64 | Celeron M 540 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | false |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















