Turion II M500
VS
Core i7-2677M

Turion II M500 vs Core i7-2677M

AMD

Turion II M500

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Core i7-2677M

2 Cores4 Thrd17 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Turion II M500 is positioned at rank 322 and the Core i7-2677M is on rank 227, so the Core i7-2677M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Turion II M500

#96
Ryzen AI Max PRO 380
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
99%
#97
Core Ultra 5 226V
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
99%
#310
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
472%
#311
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
465%
#312
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
427%
#313
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
425%
#314
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
421%
#316
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
407%
#317
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
390%
#318
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
389%
#319
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
379%
#322
Turion II M500
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#336
Xeon E3-1505M v5
MSRP: $115|Avg: $115
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2677M

#214
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
391%
#215
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
385%
#216
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
354%
#217
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
352%
#218
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
349%
#220
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
337%
#221
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
323%
#222
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
323%
#223
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
314%
#227
Core i7-2677M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i7-2677M delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Turion II M500 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.5% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightTurion II M500Core i7-2677M
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Caspian (2009) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightTurion II M500Core i7-2677M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Turion II M500 and Core i7-2677M

AMD

Turion II M500

The Turion II M500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Caspian (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g3. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,865 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i7-2677M

The Core i7-2677M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,875 points. Launch price was $317.

Processing Power

The Turion II M500 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i7-2677M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Turion II M500 versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i7-2677M — a 27.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-2677M. The Turion II M500 uses the Caspian (2009) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i7-2677M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Turion II M500 scores 1,865 against the Core i7-2677M's 1,875 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i7-2677M.

FeatureTurion II M500Core i7-2677M
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz
2.9 GHz+32%
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
512 kB
Process
45 nm
32 nm-29%
Architecture
Caspian (2009)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,865
1,875
Geekbench 6 Single
562
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Turion II M500 uses the S1g3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-2677M uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureTurion II M500Core i7-2677M
Socket
S1g3
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Turion II M500) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-2677M). The Core i7-2677M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Turion II M500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2677M targets Ultrabook. Direct competitor: Core i7-2677M rivals A6-3420M.

FeatureTurion II M500Core i7-2677M
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Ultrabook