Turion II P520
VS
Celeron G3900E

Turion II P520 vs Celeron G3900E

AMD

Turion II P520

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Celeron G3900E

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Turion II P520 is positioned at rank 281 and the Celeron G3900E is on rank 816, so the Turion II P520 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Turion II P520

#82
Core i7-11700B
MSRP: $323|Avg: $311
98%
#83
Core i7-13700HX
MSRP: $485|Avg: N/A
97%
#269
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
430%
#270
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
424%
#271
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
389%
#272
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
387%
#273
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
384%
#275
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
371%
#276
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
355%
#277
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
355%
#278
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
345%
#281
Turion II P520
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G3900E

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
16397%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
15494%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11250%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3389%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2685%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2348%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1345%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1328%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1209%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1209%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1195%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1163%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1147%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1142%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1132%
#816
Celeron G3900E
MSRP: $107|Avg: $35
100%
#817
Athlon II X3 435
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
99%
#818
Core i7-6822EQ
MSRP: $294|Avg: $190
99%
#819
Athlon II X4 645
MSRP: $126|Avg: $20
99%
#820
Core i5-7400
MSRP: $294|Avg: $70
98%
#821
Pentium E5800
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
98%
#822
Core i7-6820EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $344
98%
#823
A6-9500
MSRP: $101|Avg: $25
98%
#824
Pentium G2120T
MSRP: $87|Avg: $10
98%
#825
Athlon II X2 270
MSRP: $72|Avg: $15
97%
#827
Core i7-6850K
MSRP: $617|Avg: $80
97%
#828
Core i5-2500K
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
97%
#829
Pentium G3430
MSRP: $116|Avg: $30
96%
#830
Pentium E5400
MSRP: $55|Avg: $49
96%
#831
Core i5-4570R
MSRP: $250|Avg: $20
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron G3900E (2016) utilizes 14 nm technology and LPDDR3-1866, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightTurion II P520Celeron G3900E
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($35)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Champlain (2010−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Turion II P520 (2010) relies on 45 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightTurion II P520Celeron G3900E
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($35)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Turion II P520 and Celeron G3900E

AMD

Turion II P520

The Turion II P520 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,047 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Celeron G3900E

The Celeron G3900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,034 points. Launch price was $107.

Processing Power

Both the Turion II P520 and Celeron G3900E share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Turion II P520 versus 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G3900E — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Celeron G3900E. The Turion II P520 uses the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron G3900E uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Turion II P520 scores 2,047 against the Celeron G3900E's 2,034 — a 0.6% lead for the Turion II P520.

FeatureTurion II P520Celeron G3900E
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.3 GHz
2.4 GHz+4%
L3 Cache
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
512 kB
Process
45 nm
14 nm-69%
Architecture
Champlain (2010−2011)
Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark
2,047
2,034
Geekbench 6 Single
699
Geekbench 6 Multi
948
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Turion II P520) / VT-x (Celeron G3900E). The Celeron G3900E includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 510), while the Turion II P520 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3900E targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3900E rivals Pentium G4400.

FeatureTurion II P520Celeron G3900E
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 510
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget