Turion II P520 vs Xeon X5355

AMD

Turion II P520

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon X5355

4 Cores4 Thrd120 WWMax: 0.67 GHz2006
Similar parts
·······

Turion II P520 vs Xeon X5355 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Turion II P520 vs Xeon X5355 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Turion II P520 vs Xeon X5355: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Turion II P520

2010

Why buy it

  • Draws 2W instead of 120W, a 118W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X5355, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.

Xeon X5355

2006

Why buy it

  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,039 vs 2,047).
  • Launch MSRP is still $4,491 MSRP, while Turion II P520 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 5900% higher power demand at 120W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Turion II P520 better than Xeon X5355?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X5355 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Turion II P520 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Turion II P520 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion II P520 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Turion II P520 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon X5355 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Turion II P520 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $4,491 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon X5355 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (0.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Turion II P520 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Turion II P520 vs Xeon X5355 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Turion II P520

The Turion II P520 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,047 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Xeon X5355

The Xeon X5355 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 November 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Clovertown (2006−2007) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 0.67 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,039 points. Launch price was $1,172.

Processing Power

The Turion II P520 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon X5355 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon X5355 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Turion II P520 versus 0.67 GHz on the Xeon X5355 — a 109.8% clock advantage for the Turion II P520. The Turion II P520 uses the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Xeon X5355 uses Clovertown (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Turion II P520 scores 2,047 against the Xeon X5355's 2,039 — a 0.4% lead for the Turion II P520.

FeatureTurion II P520Xeon X5355
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2.3 GHz+243%
0.67 GHz
Base Clock
2.66 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB (total)+100%
Process
45 nm-31%
65 nm
Architecture
Champlain (2010−2011)
Clovertown (2006−2007)
PassMark
2,047
2,039
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Turion II P520 uses the S1g4 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon X5355 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureTurion II P520Xeon X5355
Socket
S1g4
LGA771
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0