Celeron B710 vs Turion II P520

Celeron B710 vs Turion II P520 Performance Spectrum

Celeron B710

1 / 1

2,051

+0.2%

2,047

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron B710 vs Turion II P520 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron B710 vs Turion II P520: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron B710

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Turion II P520 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Turion II P520 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $86 MSRP, while Turion II P520 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1650% higher power demand at 35W vs 2W.

Turion II P520

2010

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 2W instead of 35W, a 33W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,047 vs 2,051).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron B710 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron B710 better than Turion II P520?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Turion II P520 is ahead with a 3.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron B710 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron B710 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron B710 is the better buy right now. Celeron B710 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $86 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that Turion II P520 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (23.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron B710 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron B710 vs Turion II P520 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron B710

The Celeron B710 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,051 points. Launch price was $70.

Turion II P520

The Turion II P520 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,047 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron B710 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Turion II P520 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Turion II P520 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron B710 versus 2.3 GHz on the Turion II P520 — a 35.9% clock advantage for the Turion II P520. The Celeron B710 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Turion II P520 uses Champlain (2010−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron B710 scores 2,051 against the Turion II P520's 2,047 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron B710.

Feature	Celeron B710	Turion II P520
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	2.3 GHz+44%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	—
L3 Cache	1.5 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Champlain (2010−2011)
PassMark	2,051	2,047
Geekbench 6 Single	231	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	196	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron B710 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Turion II P520 uses S1g4 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron B710	Turion II P520
Socket	PGA988	S1g4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron B710) / not specified (Turion II P520). The Celeron B710 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Turion II P520 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B710 targets Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron B710 rivals Pentium 967.