Celeron B710
VS
Xeon E7-8890 v4

Celeron B710 vs Xeon E7-8890 v4

Intel

Celeron B710

1 Cores1 Thrd35 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Xeon E7-8890 v4

24 Cores48 Thrd165 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron B710 is positioned at rank 811 and the Xeon E7-8890 v4 is on rank 864, so the Celeron B710 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron B710

#799
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1230%
#800
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1212%
#801
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1113%
#802
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1108%
#803
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1098%
#805
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1060%
#806
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1016%
#807
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1015%
#808
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
987%
#811
Celeron B710
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
100%
#813
Athlon II Neo K345
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
100%
#818
Core i7-8709G
MSRP: $338|Avg: $150
98%
#819
Celeron M 560
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
98%
#824
Celeron Dual-Core T3000
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
94%
#825
Pentium P6100
MSRP: $100|Avg: $16.39
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E7-8890 v4

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
20236%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
3821%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
3395%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
2622%
#485
Xeon Gold 6258R
MSRP: $3950|Avg: $1400
100%
#486
EPYC 9175F
MSRP: $4256|Avg: $3703
100%
#488
EPYC 9534
MSRP: $8803|Avg: $2999
99%
#489
EPYC 9654
MSRP: $11805|Avg: $5345
98%
#490
EPYC 7H12
MSRP: $6950|Avg: $1340
98%
#491
EPYC 7742
MSRP: $6950|Avg: $800
97%
#492
Xeon Platinum 8352M
MSRP: $4471|Avg: $4471
97%
#493
Xeon Platinum 8570
MSRP: $9595|Avg: $9595
95%
#864
Xeon E7-8890 v4
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#871
Xeon 6315P
MSRP: $1166|Avg: $160
98%
#877
Xeon X5687
MSRP: $552|Avg: $189
95%
#878
Xeon E5-2630 v4
MSRP: $1171|Avg: $130
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E7-8890 v4 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCeleron B710Xeon E7-8890 v4
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell (2015−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron B710 ($10), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($10 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCeleron B710Xeon E7-8890 v4
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron B710 and Xeon E7-8890 v4

Intel

Celeron B710

The Celeron B710 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,051 points. Launch price was $70.

Intel

Xeon E7-8890 v4

The Xeon E7-8890 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,054 points. Launch price was $7,174.

Processing Power

The Celeron B710 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Xeon E7-8890 v4 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon E7-8890 v4 has 23 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron B710 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E7-8890 v4 — a 72% clock advantage for the Xeon E7-8890 v4 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Celeron B710 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E7-8890 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron B710 scores 2,051 against the Xeon E7-8890 v4's 2,054 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E7-8890 v4. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total) on the Celeron B710 vs 60 MB on the Xeon E7-8890 v4.

FeatureCeleron B710Xeon E7-8890 v4
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
24 / 48+2300%
Boost Clock
1.6 GHz
3.4 GHz+112%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
2.2 GHz+38%
L3 Cache
1.5 MB (total)
60 MB+3900%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
6 MB+2300%
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark
2,051
2,054
Geekbench 6 Single
231
Geekbench 6 Multi
196
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron B710 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E7-8890 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron B710Xeon E7-8890 v4
Socket
PGA988
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron B710) / not specified (Xeon E7-8890 v4). The Celeron B710 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Xeon E7-8890 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B710 targets Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron B710 rivals Pentium 967.

FeatureCeleron B710Xeon E7-8890 v4
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Laptop