Celeron B710 vs Xeon E7-8890 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron B710 vs Xeon E7-8890 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron B710 vs Xeon E7-8890 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron B710

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 165W, a 130W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Xeon E7-8890 v4 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E7-8890 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,051 vs 2,054).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 60 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E7-8890 v4, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $86 MSRP, while Xeon E7-8890 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E7-8890 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+3900% larger total L3 cache (60 MB vs 1.5 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads.

Trade-offs

❌371.4% higher power demand at 165W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron B710 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E7-8890 v4 better than Celeron B710?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E7-8890 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron B710 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E7-8890 v4 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E7-8890 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 3900% larger total L3 cache (60 MB vs 1.5 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E7-8890 v4 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Xeon E7-8890 v4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron B710 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2011 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (23.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA988.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E7-8890 v4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2011), 3900% larger total L3 cache (60 MB vs 1.5 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 48 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron B710 vs Xeon E7-8890 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron B710

The Celeron B710 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,051 points. Launch price was $70.

Xeon E7-8890 v4

The Xeon E7-8890 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,054 points. Launch price was $7,174.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron B710 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Xeon E7-8890 v4 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon E7-8890 v4 has 23 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron B710 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E7-8890 v4 — a 72% clock advantage for the Xeon E7-8890 v4 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Celeron B710 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E7-8890 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron B710 scores 2,051 against the Xeon E7-8890 v4's 2,054 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E7-8890 v4. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total) on the Celeron B710 vs 60 MB on the Xeon E7-8890 v4.

Feature	Celeron B710	Xeon E7-8890 v4
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	24 / 48+2300%
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	3.4 GHz+112%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	2.2 GHz+38%
L3 Cache	1.5 MB (total)	60 MB+3900%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+4167%	6 MB
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	2,051	2,054
Geekbench 6 Single	231	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	196	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron B710 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E7-8890 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron B710	Xeon E7-8890 v4
Socket	PGA988	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron B710) / not specified (Xeon E7-8890 v4). The Celeron B710 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Xeon E7-8890 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B710 targets Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron B710 rivals Pentium 967.