Celeron B710 vs Celeron M 585

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron B710 vs Celeron M 585 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron B710 vs Celeron M 585: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron B710

2011

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Celeron M 585 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron M 585 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,051 vs 2,062).
❌Launch MSRP is still $86 MSRP, while Celeron M 585 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.

Celeron M 585

2008

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron B710 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron M 585 better than Celeron B710?

Yes. Celeron M 585 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron M 585 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M 585 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron M 585 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron M 585 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron B710 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2011 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (23.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA988.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron B710 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron B710 vs Celeron M 585 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron B710

The Celeron B710 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,051 points. Launch price was $70.

Celeron M 585

The Celeron M 585 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 August 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.16 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,062 points. Launch price was $70.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron B710 and Celeron M 585 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron B710 versus 2.16 GHz on the Celeron M 585 — a 29.8% clock advantage for the Celeron M 585. The Celeron B710 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron M 585 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron B710 scores 2,051 against the Celeron M 585's 2,062 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron M 585.

Feature	Celeron B710	Celeron M 585
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	2.16 GHz+35%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	—
L3 Cache	1.5 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark	2,051	2,062
Geekbench 6 Single	231	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	196	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron B710 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron M 585 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron B710 versus 800 on the Celeron M 585 — the Celeron B710 supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron B710 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron B710) vs 0 (Celeron M 585) — the Celeron B710 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67 (Celeron B710) and GL40,GM45 (Celeron M 585).

Feature	Celeron B710	Celeron M 585
Socket	PGA988	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333+67%	800
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+300%	4 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron B710) vs false (Celeron M 585). The Celeron B710 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Celeron M 585 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B710 targets Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron B710 rivals Pentium 967; Celeron M 585 rivals Mobile Sempron SI-40.