Celeron B710 vs Celeron N4505

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron B710 vs Celeron N4505 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron B710 vs Celeron N4505: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron B710

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Celeron N4505 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 4 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $86 MSRP, while Celeron N4505 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌250% higher power demand at 35W vs 10W.

Celeron N4505

2021

Why buy it

✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 1.5 MB).
✅Draws 10W instead of 35W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,037 vs 2,051).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron B710 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N4505 better than Celeron B710?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron N4505 is ahead with a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron B710 pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark. Celeron N4505 also has the bigger cache pool with 166.7% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 1.5 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron B710 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N4505 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron N4505 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron B710 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2011 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (23.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA988.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N4505 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2011) and 166.7% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 1.5 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron B710 vs Celeron N4505 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron B710

The Celeron B710 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,051 points. Launch price was $70.

Celeron N4505

The Celeron N4505 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.5 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,037 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron B710 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Celeron N4505 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron N4505 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron B710 versus 2.9 GHz on the Celeron N4505 — a 57.8% clock advantage for the Celeron N4505 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Celeron B710 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron N4505 uses Jasper Lake (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron B710 scores 2,051 against the Celeron N4505's 2,037 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron B710. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total) on the Celeron B710 vs 4 MB (total) on the Celeron N4505.

Feature	Celeron B710	Celeron N4505
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	2.9 GHz+81%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	2 GHz+25%
L3 Cache	1.5 MB (total)	4 MB (total)+167%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+16967%	1.5 MB (total)
Process	32 nm	10 nm-69%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Jasper Lake (2021)
PassMark	2,051	2,037
Geekbench 6 Single	231	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	196	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron B710 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron N4505 uses BGA1338 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron B710	Celeron N4505
Socket	PGA988	BGA1338
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 4.0+100%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron B710) / not specified (Celeron N4505). The Celeron B710 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Celeron N4505 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B710 targets Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron B710 rivals Pentium 967.