Celeron B710 vs Xeon X5355

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron B710 vs Xeon X5355 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron B710 vs Xeon X5355: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron B710

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $4,405 less on MSRP ($86 MSRP vs $4,491 MSRP).
✅Delivers 5152.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 23.8 vs 0.5 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $4,491 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 120W, a 85W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Xeon X5355 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X5355, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.

Xeon X5355

2006

Why buy it

✅+433.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 1.5 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,039 vs 2,051).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 0.5 vs 23.8 PassMark/$ ($4,491 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
❌242.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron B710 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron B710 better than Xeon X5355?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X5355 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron B710 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron B710 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron B710 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron B710 is the better buy right now. Celeron B710 comes in $4,405 cheaper on MSRP at $86 MSRP versus $4,491 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 5152.8% better value on MSRP (23.8 vs 0.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron B710 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron B710 vs Xeon X5355 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron B710

The Celeron B710 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,051 points. Launch price was $70.

Xeon X5355

The Xeon X5355 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 November 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Clovertown (2006−2007) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 0.67 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,039 points. Launch price was $1,172.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron B710 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Xeon X5355 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon X5355 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron B710 versus 0.67 GHz on the Xeon X5355 — a 81.9% clock advantage for the Celeron B710 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Celeron B710 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon X5355 uses Clovertown (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron B710 scores 2,051 against the Xeon X5355's 2,039 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron B710. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total) on the Celeron B710 vs 8 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X5355.

Feature	Celeron B710	Xeon X5355
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	4 / 4+300%
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz+139%	0.67 GHz
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	2.66 GHz+66%
L3 Cache	1.5 MB (total)	8 MB L2 Cache+433%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+6300%	4 MB (total)
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Clovertown (2006−2007)
PassMark	2,051	2,039
Geekbench 6 Single	231	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	196	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron B710 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon X5355 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron B710	Xeon X5355
Socket	PGA988	LGA771
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron B710) / not specified (Xeon X5355). The Celeron B710 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Xeon X5355 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B710 targets Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron B710 rivals Pentium 967.

Feature	Celeron B710	Xeon X5355
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Laptop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron B710 was priced at $86, while the Xeon X5355 came in at $4491. On launch pricing ($86 vs $4491), Celeron B710 was $4405 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron B710 delivers 23.8 pts/$ vs 0.5 pts/$ for the Xeon X5355 — making the Celeron B710 the 192.5% better value option.

Feature	Celeron B710	Xeon X5355
MSRP	$86-98%	$4491
Performance per Dollar	23.8+4660%	0.5
Release Date	2011	2006

Search Celeron B710 on Amazon

Search Xeon X5355 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.