
Celeron B710

Pentium G3258
Celeron B710 vs Pentium G3258 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron B710 vs Pentium G3258 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron B710 vs Pentium G3258: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron B710
2011Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 54W, a 19W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Pentium G3258 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,051 vs 2,063).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 3 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.8 vs 27.5 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $75 MSRP).
Pentium G3258
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 1.5 MB).
- ✅Costs $11 less on MSRP ($75 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 15.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.5 vs 23.8 PassMark/$ ($75 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌54.3% higher power demand at 54W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium G3258 better than Celeron B710?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron B710 vs Pentium G3258 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron B710
The Celeron B710 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,051 points. Launch price was $70.

Pentium G3258
The Pentium G3258 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,063 points. Launch price was $77.
Processing Power
The Celeron B710 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Pentium G3258 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Pentium G3258 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron B710 versus 3.2 GHz on the Pentium G3258 — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Pentium G3258 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Celeron B710 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium G3258 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron B710 scores 2,051 against the Pentium G3258's 2,063 — a 0.6% lead for the Pentium G3258. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total) on the Celeron B710 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G3258.
| Feature | Celeron B710 | Pentium G3258 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 2 / 2+100% |
| Boost Clock | 1.6 GHz | 3.2 GHz+100% |
| Base Clock | 1.6 GHz | 3.2 GHz+100% |
| L3 Cache | 1.5 MB (total) | 3 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 22 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 2,051 | 2,063 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 231 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 196 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron B710 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium G3258 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The Pentium G3258 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Celeron B710 | Pentium G3258 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA988 | LGA1150 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Pentium G3258 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support VT-x virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron B710) and HD Graphics (Pentium G3258) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B710 targets Laptop, Pentium G3258 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron B710 rivals Pentium 967.
| Feature | Celeron B710 | Pentium G3258 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | HD Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x |
| Target Use | Laptop | Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron B710 was priced at $86, while the Pentium G3258 came in at $75. On launch pricing ($86 vs $75), Pentium G3258 was $11 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron B710 delivers 23.8 pts/$ vs 27.5 pts/$ for the Pentium G3258 — making the Pentium G3258 the 14.2% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron B710 | Pentium G3258 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $86 | $75-13% |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.8 | 27.5+16% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2014 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














