Core 2 Duo T7300 vs Turion II P520

Intel

Core 2 Duo T7300

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 2 GHz2007
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Turion II P520

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······

Core 2 Duo T7300 vs Turion II P520 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Duo T7300 vs Turion II P520 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Duo T7300 vs Turion II P520: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Duo T7300

2007

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (2,040 vs 2,047).
    • 100% higher power demand at 4W vs 2W.

    Turion II P520

    2010

    Why buy it

    • Draws 2W instead of 4W, a 2W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Turion II P520 better than Core 2 Duo T7300?
    Yes. Turion II P520 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Turion II P520 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion II P520 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Turion II P520 still makes the most sense overall. Turion II P520 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Turion II P520 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Core 2 Duo T7300 vs Turion II P520 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Core 2 Duo T7300

    The Core 2 Duo T7300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 May 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,040 points. Launch price was $234.

    AMD

    Turion II P520

    The Turion II P520 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,047 points. Launch price was $69.

    Processing Power

    Both the Core 2 Duo T7300 and Turion II P520 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7300 versus 2.3 GHz on the Turion II P520 — a 14% clock advantage for the Turion II P520. The Core 2 Duo T7300 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Turion II P520 uses Champlain (2010−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T7300 scores 2,040 against the Turion II P520's 2,047 — a 0.3% lead for the Turion II P520.

    FeatureCore 2 Duo T7300Turion II P520
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 2
    2 / 2
    Boost Clock
    2 GHz
    2.3 GHz+15%
    Base Clock
    2 GHz
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    4 MB+100%
    2 MB
    Process
    65 nm
    45 nm-31%
    Architecture
    Merom (2006−2008)
    Champlain (2010−2011)
    PassMark
    2,040
    2,047
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    3,499
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Core 2 Duo T7300 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Turion II P520 uses S1g4 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCore 2 Duo T7300Turion II P520
    Socket
    PGA478
    S1g4
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 2.0+82%
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR2-667
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: VT-x (Core 2 Duo T7300) / not specified (Turion II P520). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T7300 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo T7300 rivals Athlon 64 X2 TK-42.

    FeatureCore 2 Duo T7300Turion II P520
    Integrated GPU
    No
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    VT-x
    Target Use
    Budget