Core 2 Duo T7300
VS
Xeon X5355

Core 2 Duo T7300 vs Xeon X5355

Intel

Core 2 Duo T7300

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 2 GHz2007
VS
Intel

Xeon X5355

4 Cores4 Thrd120 WWMax: 0.67 GHz2006

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo T7300 is positioned at rank 283 and the Xeon X5355 is on rank 1032, so the Core 2 Duo T7300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T7300

#82
Core i7-11700B
MSRP: $323|Avg: $311
98%
#83
Core i7-13700HX
MSRP: $485|Avg: N/A
98%
#271
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
431%
#272
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
425%
#273
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
390%
#274
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
389%
#275
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
385%
#277
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
372%
#278
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
356%
#279
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
356%
#280
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
346%
#283
Core 2 Duo T7300
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon X5355

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
461829%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
87198%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
77471%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
59849%
#1032
Xeon X5355
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4000
100%
#1033
Xeon E5420
MSRP: $7214|Avg: $6500
62%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($4,000) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon X5355 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore 2 Duo T7300Xeon X5355
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($4,000)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Clovertown (2006−2007) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo T7300 ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($4,000 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore 2 Duo T7300Xeon X5355
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($4,000)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo T7300 and Xeon X5355

Intel

Core 2 Duo T7300

The Core 2 Duo T7300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 May 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,040 points. Launch price was $234.

Intel

Xeon X5355

The Xeon X5355 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 November 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Clovertown (2006−2007) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 0.67 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,039 points. Launch price was $1,172.

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo T7300 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon X5355 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon X5355 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7300 versus 0.67 GHz on the Xeon X5355 — a 99.6% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo T7300 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Core 2 Duo T7300 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Xeon X5355 uses Clovertown (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T7300 scores 2,040 against the Xeon X5355's 2,039 — a 0% lead for the Core 2 Duo T7300. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo T7300 vs 8 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X5355.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T7300Xeon X5355
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2 GHz+199%
0.67 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz
2.66 GHz+33%
L3 Cache
0 kB
8 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
4 MB
4 MB (total)
Process
65 nm
65 nm
Architecture
Merom (2006−2008)
Clovertown (2006−2007)
PassMark
2,040
2,039
Geekbench 6 Multi
3,499
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo T7300 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Xeon X5355 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T7300Xeon X5355
Socket
PGA478
LGA771
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Core 2 Duo T7300) / not specified (Xeon X5355). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T7300 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo T7300 rivals Athlon 64 X2 TK-42.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T7300Xeon X5355
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget