Celeron N4505 vs Core 2 Duo T7300

Intel

Celeron N4505

2 Cores2 Thrd10 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2021
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo T7300

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 2 GHz2007
Similar parts
·······

Celeron N4505 vs Core 2 Duo T7300 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N4505 vs Core 2 Duo T7300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N4505 vs Core 2 Duo T7300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N4505

2021

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 2 Duo T7300 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower PassMark (2,037 vs 2,040).
    • 150% higher power demand at 10W vs 4W.

    Core 2 Duo T7300

    2007

    Why buy it

    • Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Draws 4W instead of 10W, a 6W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Core 2 Duo T7300 better than Celeron N4505?
    Yes. Core 2 Duo T7300 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Core 2 Duo T7300 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo T7300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Core 2 Duo T7300 still makes the most sense overall. Core 2 Duo T7300 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Celeron N4505 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Celeron N4505 vs Core 2 Duo T7300 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Celeron N4505

    The Celeron N4505 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.5 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,037 points. Launch price was $69.

    Intel

    Core 2 Duo T7300

    The Core 2 Duo T7300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 May 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,040 points. Launch price was $234.

    Processing Power

    Both the Celeron N4505 and Core 2 Duo T7300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron N4505 versus 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7300 — a 36.7% clock advantage for the Celeron N4505 (base: 2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Celeron N4505 uses the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T7300 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N4505 scores 2,037 against the Core 2 Duo T7300's 2,040 — a 0.1% lead for the Core 2 Duo T7300. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron N4505 vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo T7300.

    FeatureCeleron N4505Core 2 Duo T7300
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 2
    2 / 2
    Boost Clock
    2.9 GHz+45%
    2 GHz
    Base Clock
    2 GHz
    2 GHz
    L3 Cache
    4 MB (total)
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    1.5 MB (total)
    4 MB+167%
    Process
    10 nm-85%
    65 nm
    Architecture
    Jasper Lake (2021)
    Merom (2006−2008)
    PassMark
    2,037
    2,040
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    3,499
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Celeron N4505 uses the BGA1338 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core 2 Duo T7300 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCeleron N4505Core 2 Duo T7300
    Socket
    BGA1338
    PGA478
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 4.0+264%
    PCIe 1.1
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR2-667
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: not specified (Celeron N4505) / VT-x (Core 2 Duo T7300). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T7300 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo T7300 rivals Athlon 64 X2 TK-42.

    FeatureCeleron N4505Core 2 Duo T7300
    Integrated GPU
    No
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    VT-x
    Target Use
    Budget