Celeron N4505 vs Phenom II X4 810

Celeron N4505 vs Phenom II X4 810 Performance Spectrum

Celeron N4505

2 / 2

2,037

0.0%

2,036

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N4505 vs Phenom II X4 810 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N4505 vs Phenom II X4 810: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N4505

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 10W instead of 95W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Phenom II X4 810

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,036 vs 2,037).
❌Launch MSRP is still $175 MSRP, while Celeron N4505 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌850% higher power demand at 95W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N4505 better than Phenom II X4 810?

Yes. Celeron N4505 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron N4505 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N4505 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N4505 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron N4505 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $175 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Phenom II X4 810 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (11.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N4505 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron N4505 vs Phenom II X4 810 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N4505

The Celeron N4505 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.5 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,037 points. Launch price was $69.

Phenom II X4 810

The Phenom II X4 810 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 9 February 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,036 points. Launch price was $116.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron N4505 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom II X4 810 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom II X4 810 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron N4505 versus 2.6 GHz on the Phenom II X4 810 — a 10.9% clock advantage for the Celeron N4505 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Celeron N4505 uses the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Phenom II X4 810 uses Deneb (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N4505 scores 2,037 against the Phenom II X4 810's 2,036 — a 0% lead for the Celeron N4505. Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron N4505	Phenom II X4 810
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz+12%	2.6 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.6 GHz+30%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.5 MB (total)+200%	512 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm-78%	45 nm
Architecture	Jasper Lake (2021)	Deneb (2009−2011)
PassMark	2,037	2,036

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N4505 uses the BGA1338 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Phenom II X4 810 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.