Celeron N4505 vs Xeon E7-8890 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N4505 vs Xeon E7-8890 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N4505 vs Xeon E7-8890 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N4505

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 10W instead of 165W, a 155W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E7-8890 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,037 vs 2,054).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 60 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E7-8890 v4, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads.

Xeon E7-8890 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+1400% larger total L3 cache (60 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads.

Trade-offs

❌1550% higher power demand at 165W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E7-8890 v4 better than Celeron N4505?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E7-8890 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron N4505 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E7-8890 v4 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E7-8890 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 1400% larger total L3 cache (60 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E7-8890 v4 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E7-8890 v4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N4505 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron N4505 vs Xeon E7-8890 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N4505

The Celeron N4505 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.5 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,037 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon E7-8890 v4

The Xeon E7-8890 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,054 points. Launch price was $7,174.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron N4505 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon E7-8890 v4 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon E7-8890 v4 has 22 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron N4505 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E7-8890 v4 — a 15.9% clock advantage for the Xeon E7-8890 v4 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Celeron N4505 uses the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E7-8890 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N4505 scores 2,037 against the Xeon E7-8890 v4's 2,054 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon E7-8890 v4. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron N4505 vs 60 MB on the Xeon E7-8890 v4.

Feature	Celeron N4505	Xeon E7-8890 v4
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	24 / 48+1100%
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	3.4 GHz+17%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.2 GHz+10%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	60 MB+1400%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB (total)	6 MB+300%
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Jasper Lake (2021)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	2,037	2,054

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N4505 uses the BGA1338 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E7-8890 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.