Turion II P520 vs Xeon E7-8890 v4

Turion II P520 vs Xeon E7-8890 v4 Performance Spectrum

Turion II P520

2 / 2

2,047

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon E7-8890 v4

24 / 48

2,054

+0.3%

Core 2 Duo E7600

Core i3-2370M

Pentium Dual Core T2370

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Turion II P520 vs Xeon E7-8890 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Turion II P520 vs Xeon E7-8890 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Turion II P520

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 165W, a 163W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E7-8890 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,047 vs 2,054).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E7-8890 v4, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads.

Xeon E7-8890 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads.

Trade-offs

❌8150% higher power demand at 165W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E7-8890 v4 better than Turion II P520?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E7-8890 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Turion II P520 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E7-8890 v4 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E7-8890 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E7-8890 v4 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E7-8890 v4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E7-8890 v4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 48 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Turion II P520 vs Xeon E7-8890 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Turion II P520

The Turion II P520 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,047 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon E7-8890 v4

The Xeon E7-8890 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,054 points. Launch price was $7,174.

⚡

Processing Power

The Turion II P520 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon E7-8890 v4 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon E7-8890 v4 has 22 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Turion II P520 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E7-8890 v4 — a 38.6% clock advantage for the Xeon E7-8890 v4. The Turion II P520 uses the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Xeon E7-8890 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Turion II P520 scores 2,047 against the Xeon E7-8890 v4's 2,054 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E7-8890 v4.

Feature	Turion II P520	Xeon E7-8890 v4
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	24 / 48+1100%
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz	3.4 GHz+48%
Base Clock	—	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	—	60 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB	6 MB+200%
Process	45 nm	14 nm-69%
Architecture	Champlain (2010−2011)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	2,047	2,054

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Turion II P520 uses the S1g4 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E7-8890 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.