Celeron M 585 vs Turion II P520

Celeron M 585 vs Turion II P520 Performance Spectrum

Celeron M 585

1 / 1

2,062

+0.7%

Celeron J1900

Core Duo T2300

Pentium Dual Core T2370

2,047

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron M 585 vs Turion II P520 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron M 585 vs Turion II P520: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron M 585

2008

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 1W instead of 2W, a 1W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Turion II P520

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,047 vs 2,062).
❌100% higher power demand at 2W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron M 585 better than Turion II P520?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Turion II P520 is ahead with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M 585 pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M 585 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron M 585 still makes the most sense overall. Celeron M 585 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Turion II P520 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron M 585 vs Turion II P520 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron M 585

The Celeron M 585 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 August 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.16 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,062 points. Launch price was $70.

Turion II P520

The Turion II P520 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,047 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron M 585 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Turion II P520 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Turion II P520 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.16 GHz on the Celeron M 585 versus 2.3 GHz on the Turion II P520 — a 6.3% clock advantage for the Turion II P520. The Celeron M 585 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Turion II P520 uses Champlain (2010−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron M 585 scores 2,062 against the Turion II P520's 2,047 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron M 585.

Feature	Celeron M 585	Turion II P520
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock	2.16 GHz	2.3 GHz+6%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%
Process	65 nm	45 nm-31%
Architecture	Merom (2006−2008)	Champlain (2010−2011)
PassMark	2,062	2,047

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron M 585 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Turion II P520 uses S1g4 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.