Celeron M 585 vs Phenom II X4 830

Celeron M 585 vs Phenom II X4 830 Performance Spectrum

Celeron M 585

1 / 1

2,062

0.0%

Celeron J1900

Core Duo T2300

Pentium Dual Core T2370

2,072

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron M 585 vs Phenom II X4 830 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron M 585 vs Phenom II X4 830: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron M 585

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 95W, a 94W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,062 vs 2,072).

Phenom II X4 830

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌9400% higher power demand at 95W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Phenom II X4 830 better than Celeron M 585?

Yes. Phenom II X4 830 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Phenom II X4 830 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Phenom II X4 830 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Phenom II X4 830 still makes the most sense overall. Phenom II X4 830 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Phenom II X4 830 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron M 585 vs Phenom II X4 830 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron M 585

The Celeron M 585 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 August 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.16 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,062 points. Launch price was $70.

Phenom II X4 830

The Phenom II X4 830 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,072 points. Launch price was $80.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron M 585 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Phenom II X4 830 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom II X4 830 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.16 GHz on the Celeron M 585 versus 2.8 GHz on the Phenom II X4 830 — a 25.8% clock advantage for the Phenom II X4 830. The Celeron M 585 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Phenom II X4 830 uses Deneb (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron M 585 scores 2,062 against the Phenom II X4 830's 2,072 — a 0.5% lead for the Phenom II X4 830.

Feature	Celeron M 585	Phenom II X4 830
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	4 / 4+300%
Boost Clock	2.16 GHz	2.8 GHz+30%
Base Clock	—	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	512 kB (per core)
Process	65 nm	45 nm-31%
Architecture	Merom (2006−2008)	Deneb (2009−2011)
PassMark	2,062	2,072

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron M 585 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Phenom II X4 830 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.