Celeron M 585 vs Core 2 Duo T7250

Intel

Celeron M 585

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.16 GHz2008
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo T7250

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2 GHz2007
Similar parts
·······

Celeron M 585 vs Core 2 Duo T7250 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron M 585 vs Core 2 Duo T7250 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron M 585 vs Core 2 Duo T7250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron M 585

2008

Why buy it

  • Draws 1W instead of 2W, a 1W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,062 vs 2,073).

Core 2 Duo T7250

2007

Why buy it

  • +0.5% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • 100% higher power demand at 2W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron M 585 better than Core 2 Duo T7250?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron M 585 is ahead with a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo T7250 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo T7250 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Celeron M 585 still makes the most sense overall. Celeron M 585 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron M 585 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2008 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron M 585 vs Core 2 Duo T7250 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron M 585

The Celeron M 585 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 August 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.16 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,062 points. Launch price was $70.

Intel

Core 2 Duo T7250

The Core 2 Duo T7250 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,073 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

The Celeron M 585 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Core 2 Duo T7250 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Core 2 Duo T7250 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.16 GHz on the Celeron M 585 versus 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7250 — a 7.7% clock advantage for the Celeron M 585. Both are built on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture using a 65 nm process. In PassMark, the Celeron M 585 scores 2,062 against the Core 2 Duo T7250's 2,073 — a 0.5% lead for the Core 2 Duo T7250.

FeatureCeleron M 585Core 2 Duo T7250
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock
2.16 GHz+8%
2 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
Process
65 nm
65 nm
Architecture
Merom (2006−2008)
Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark
2,062
2,073
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the PGA478 socket with PCIe 1.1. Maximum memory speed reaches 800 on the Celeron M 585 versus DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T7250 — the Celeron M 585 supports 19.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: GL40,GM45 (Celeron M 585) and GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T7250).

FeatureCeleron M 585Core 2 Duo T7250
Socket
PGA478
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
800+20%
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
4
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: false (Celeron M 585) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo T7250). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T7250 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron M 585 rivals Mobile Sempron SI-40; Core 2 Duo T7250 rivals Athlon 64 X2 TK-42.

FeatureCeleron M 585Core 2 Duo T7250
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
false
VT-x
Target Use
Budget