Celeron M 585 vs Core i3-2130

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron M 585 vs Core i3-2130 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron M 585 vs Core i3-2130: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron M 585

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,062 vs 2,067).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-2130 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-2130.

Core i3-2130

2011

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 2000, while Celeron M 585 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron M 585.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $138 MSRP, while Celeron M 585 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌6400% higher power demand at 65W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-2130 better than Celeron M 585?

Yes. Core i3-2130 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-2130 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2130 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-2130 is the better buy right now. Core i3-2130 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $138 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (15.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-2130 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron M 585 vs Core i3-2130 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron M 585

The Celeron M 585 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 August 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.16 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,062 points. Launch price was $70.

Core i3-2130

The Core i3-2130 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,067 points. Launch price was $123.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron M 585 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Core i3-2130 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i3-2130 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.16 GHz on the Celeron M 585 versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i3-2130 — a 44.6% clock advantage for the Core i3-2130. The Celeron M 585 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i3-2130 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron M 585 scores 2,062 against the Core i3-2130's 2,067 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i3-2130.

Feature	Celeron M 585	Core i3-2130
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	2 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.16 GHz	3.4 GHz+57%
Base Clock	—	3.4 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	65 nm	32 nm-51%
Architecture	Merom (2006−2008)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	2,062	2,067
Geekbench 6 Single	—	505

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron M 585 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i3-2130 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 800 on the Celeron M 585 versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i3-2130 — the Core i3-2130 supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-2130 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron M 585) vs 16 (Core i3-2130) — the Core i3-2130 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GL40,GM45 (Celeron M 585) and H61,B65,H67,P67,Z68,Q67,Q75,H77,Z75,Z77 (Core i3-2130).

Feature	Celeron M 585	Core i3-2130
Socket	PGA478	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	800	DDR3-1333+67%
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	32 GB+700%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: false (Celeron M 585) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i3-2130). The Core i3-2130 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 2000), while the Celeron M 585 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-2130 targets Mainstream Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron M 585 rivals Mobile Sempron SI-40; Core i3-2130 rivals Pentium G860.