Celeron M 585
VS
Pentium G3258

Celeron M 585 vs Pentium G3258

Intel

Celeron M 585

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.16 GHz2008
VS
Intel

Pentium G3258

2 Cores2 Thrd54 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron M 585 is positioned at rank 430 and the Pentium G3258 is on rank 632, so the Celeron M 585 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron M 585

#418
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
569%
#419
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
561%
#420
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
515%
#421
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
513%
#422
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
508%
#424
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
490%
#425
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
470%
#426
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
469%
#427
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
457%
#430
Celeron M 585
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium G3258

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
11331%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10707%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7774%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2342%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1855%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1623%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
929%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
917%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
835%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
835%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
826%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
804%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
792%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
789%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
782%
#284
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
100%
#387
Ryzen Embedded V1807B
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
98%
#632
Pentium G3258
MSRP: $75|Avg: $72
100%
#633
Celeron G555
MSRP: $52|Avg: $15
100%
#634
Celeron G530
MSRP: $42|Avg: $10
99%
#635
Core i3-7350K
MSRP: $179|Avg: $45
99%
#636
FX-4130
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
99%
#637
Athlon II X2 280
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
99%
#638
FX-8300
MSRP: $197|Avg: $50
98%
#639
Celeron G540T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
98%
#640
Core i5-6600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $90
98%
#641
Core i5-4460
MSRP: $182|Avg: $40
98%
#644
Core i3-4170T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $17
97%
#645
FX-8370E
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
97%
#646
Core i5-4590S
MSRP: $192|Avg: $45
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Pentium G3258 (2014) utilizes 22 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron M 585Pentium G3258
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($72)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron M 585 (2008) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron M 585Pentium G3258
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($72)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron M 585 and Pentium G3258

Intel

Celeron M 585

The Celeron M 585 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 August 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.16 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,062 points. Launch price was $70.

Intel

Pentium G3258

The Pentium G3258 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,063 points. Launch price was $77.

Processing Power

The Celeron M 585 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Pentium G3258 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Pentium G3258 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.16 GHz on the Celeron M 585 versus 3.2 GHz on the Pentium G3258 — a 38.8% clock advantage for the Pentium G3258. The Celeron M 585 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Pentium G3258 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron M 585 scores 2,062 against the Pentium G3258's 2,063 — a 0% lead for the Pentium G3258.

FeatureCeleron M 585Pentium G3258
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock
2.16 GHz
3.2 GHz+48%
Base Clock
3.2 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
256 kB (per core)
Process
65 nm
22 nm-66%
Architecture
Merom (2006−2008)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
2,062
2,063
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron M 585 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium G3258 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 800 on the Celeron M 585 versus DDR3-1333 on the Pentium G3258 — the Celeron M 585 supports 198.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Pentium G3258 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 4 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron M 585) vs 16 (Pentium G3258) — the Pentium G3258 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCeleron M 585Pentium G3258
Socket
PGA478
LGA1150
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed
800+26567%
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
4
32 GB+838860700%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Pentium G3258 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: false (Celeron M 585) vs VT-x (Pentium G3258). The Pentium G3258 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics), while the Celeron M 585 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium G3258 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron M 585 rivals Mobile Sempron SI-40.

FeatureCeleron M 585Pentium G3258
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
HD Graphics
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
false
VT-x
Target Use
Desktop