Celeron M 585 vs Core i7-610E

CPU

GPU

Celeron M 585

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.16 GHz2008

Core i7-610E

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Celeron M 585

1 / 1

2,062

0.0%

Celeron J1900

Core Duo T2300

Pentium Dual Core T2370

2,071

+0.4%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron M 585 is positioned at rank 430 and the Core i7-610E is on rank 1125, so the Celeron M 585 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron M 585

#418

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

569%

#419

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

561%

#420

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

515%

#421

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

513%

#422

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

508%

#424

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

490%

#425

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

470%

#426

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

469%

#427

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

457%

#430

Celeron M 585

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-610E

#1113

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

3543%

#1114

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

3492%

#1115

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

3205%

#1116

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

3191%

#1117

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

3162%

#1119

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

3053%

#1120

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

2928%

#1121

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

2923%

#1122

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

2844%

#1125

Core i7-610E

MSRP: $250|Avg: $40

100%

#1126

Core i5-5350U

MSRP: $315|Avg: N/A

99%

#1127

Pentium Dual Core T4300

MSRP: $150|Avg: $99

99%

#1128

Core i7-3520M

MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A

99%

#1129

Core i3-4100E

MSRP: $225|Avg: $30

99%

#1130

Core i3-2310E

MSRP: $225|Avg: $20

99%

#1131

Core i5-2510E

MSRP: $230|Avg: $30

99%

#1132

Core m5-6Y54

MSRP: $281|Avg: $281

99%

#1133

Core i3-2330E

MSRP: $225|Avg: $10

98%

#1135

Core i5-4288U

MSRP: $342|Avg: N/A

94%

#1136

Core m3-6Y30

MSRP: $281|Avg: $281

94%

#1137

Core i3-2340UE

MSRP: $200|Avg: $200

93%

#1138

Core i7-2820QM

MSRP: $568|Avg: N/A

93%

#1139

Core i5-520M

MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i7-610E delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron M 585 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.4% faster) and gaming workloads.

Insight	Celeron M 585	Core i7-610E
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($40)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Insight	Celeron M 585	Core i7-610E
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($40)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Celeron M 585 Benchmark Check

Core i7-610E Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron M 585 and Core i7-610E

Celeron M 585

The Celeron M 585 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 August 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.16 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,062 points. Launch price was $70.

Core i7-610E

The Core i7-610E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 2,071 points. Launch price was $332.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron M 585 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Core i7-610E offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i7-610E has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.16 GHz on the Celeron M 585 versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-610E — a 38.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-610E. The Celeron M 585 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i7-610E uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron M 585 scores 2,062 against the Core i7-610E's 2,071 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i7-610E.

Feature	Celeron M 585	Core i7-610E
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	2 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.16 GHz	3.2 GHz+48%
Base Clock	—	2.53 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	65 nm	32 nm-51%
Architecture	Merom (2006−2008)	Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark	2,062	2,071

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron M 585 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i7-610E uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.