Turion II Ultra M600 vs Xeon X3330

Turion II Ultra M600 vs Xeon X3330 Performance Spectrum

Turion II Ultra M600

2 / 2

2,120

+0.9%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon X3330

2,102

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Turion II Ultra M600 vs Xeon X3330 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Turion II Ultra M600 vs Xeon X3330: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Turion II Ultra M600

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 2W instead of 95W, a 93W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X3330 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Xeon X3330

2008

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,102 vs 2,120).
❌4650% higher power demand at 95W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Turion II Ultra M600 better than Xeon X3330?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X3330 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Turion II Ultra M600 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion II Ultra M600 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Turion II Ultra M600 still makes the most sense overall. Turion II Ultra M600 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.9% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Turion II Ultra M600 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2008). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Turion II Ultra M600 vs Xeon X3330 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Turion II Ultra M600

The Turion II Ultra M600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Caspian (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g3. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,120 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon X3330

The Xeon X3330 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 2.66 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,102 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Turion II Ultra M600 is built on the Caspian (2009) architecture. In PassMark, the Turion II Ultra M600 scores 2,120 against the Xeon X3330's 2,102 — a 0.9% lead for the Turion II Ultra M600.

Feature	Turion II Ultra M600	Xeon X3330
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	—
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	—
Base Clock	—	2.66 GHz
L3 Cache	—	6 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	2 MB	—
Process	45 nm	45 nm
Architecture	Caspian (2009)	—
PassMark	2,120	2,102

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Turion II Ultra M600 uses the S1g3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon X3330 uses LGA775 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.