Core 2 Duo T5900 vs Turion II Ultra M600

Core 2 Duo T5900 vs Turion II Ultra M600 Performance Spectrum

Core 2 Duo T5900

2 / 2

2,123

+0.1%

2,120

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Duo T5900 vs Turion II Ultra M600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Duo T5900 vs Turion II Ultra M600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Duo T5900

2008

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Turion II Ultra M600

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,120 vs 2,123).

Quick Answers

So, is Core 2 Duo T5900 better than Turion II Ultra M600?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Turion II Ultra M600 is ahead with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo T5900 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo T5900 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 2 Duo T5900 still makes the most sense overall. Core 2 Duo T5900 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Turion II Ultra M600 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core 2 Duo T5900 vs Turion II Ultra M600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo T5900

The Core 2 Duo T5900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,123 points. Launch price was $249.

Turion II Ultra M600

The Turion II Ultra M600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Caspian (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g3. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,120 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Duo T5900 and Turion II Ultra M600 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T5900 versus 2.4 GHz on the Turion II Ultra M600 — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Turion II Ultra M600. The Core 2 Duo T5900 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Turion II Ultra M600 uses Caspian (2009) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T5900 scores 2,123 against the Turion II Ultra M600's 2,120 — a 0.1% lead for the Core 2 Duo T5900.

Feature	Core 2 Duo T5900	Turion II Ultra M600
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz	2.4 GHz+9%
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB
Process	65 nm	45 nm-31%
Architecture	Merom (2006−2008)	Caspian (2009)
PassMark	2,123	2,120

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo T5900 uses the P socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Turion II Ultra M600 uses S1g3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.