
Core 2 Duo T5900

Xeon L5420
Core 2 Duo T5900 vs Xeon L5420 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 2 Duo T5900 vs Xeon L5420 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 2 Duo T5900 vs Xeon L5420: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 2 Duo T5900
2008Why buy it
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 50W, a 48W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,123 vs 2,143).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon L5420, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.
Xeon L5420
2008Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌2400% higher power demand at 50W vs 2W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon L5420 better than Core 2 Duo T5900?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 2 Duo T5900 vs Xeon L5420 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo T5900
The Core 2 Duo T5900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,123 points. Launch price was $249.

Xeon L5420
The Xeon L5420 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 March 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 50 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,143 points. Launch price was $380.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Duo T5900 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon L5420 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon L5420 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T5900 versus 2.5 GHz on the Xeon L5420 — a 12.8% clock advantage for the Xeon L5420. The Core 2 Duo T5900 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Xeon L5420 uses Harpertown (2007−2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T5900 scores 2,123 against the Xeon L5420's 2,143 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon L5420.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T5900 | Xeon L5420 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.5 GHz+14% |
| Base Clock | — | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 12 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB (total)+200% |
| Process | 65 nm | 45 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Merom (2006−2008) | Harpertown (2007−2008) |
| PassMark | 2,123 | 2,143 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo T5900 uses the P socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Xeon L5420 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T5900 | Xeon L5420 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | P | LGA771 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













