CPU
GPU
Core 2 Duo T5900
FirePro A320
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo T5900 is positioned at rank 19 and the FirePro A320 is on rank 478, so the Core 2 Duo T5900 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T5900
Performance Per Dollar FirePro A320
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Duo T5900 | FirePro A320 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($5) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Duo T5900 | FirePro A320 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($5) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo T5900 and FirePro A320
Core 2 Duo T5900
The Core 2 Duo T5900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,123 points. Launch price was $249.
FirePro A320
The FirePro A320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,153 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Duo T5900 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the FirePro A320 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FirePro A320 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T5900 versus 4.2 GHz on the FirePro A320 — a 62.5% clock advantage for the FirePro A320. The Core 2 Duo T5900 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the FirePro A320 uses Trinity (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T5900 scores 2,123 against the FirePro A320's 2,153 — a 1.4% lead for the FirePro A320.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T5900 | FirePro A320 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz | 4.2 GHz+91% |
| Base Clock | — | 3.8 GHz |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB (total)+100% |
| Process | 65 nm | 32 nm-51% |
| Architecture | Merom (2006−2008) | Trinity (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 2,123 | 2,153+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo T5900 uses the P socket (PCIe 1.1), while the FirePro A320 uses FM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T5900 | FirePro A320 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | P | FM2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core 2 Duo T5900 and FirePro A320
