CPU
GPU
Turion II Ultra M660
Celeron G4930T
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Turion II Ultra M660 is positioned at rank #220 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Turion II Ultra M660
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G4930T
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Turion II Ultra M660 | Celeron G4930T |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($42) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Caspian (2009) / 45 nm) | ✨ Modern (Coffee Lake (2017−2019) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Turion II Ultra M660 | Celeron G4930T |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($42) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Turion II Ultra M660 and Celeron G4930T
Turion II Ultra M660
The Turion II Ultra M660 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Caspian (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.7 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g3. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 2,278 points. Launch price was $69.
Celeron G4930T
The Celeron G4930T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,287 points. Launch price was $42.
Processing Power
Both the Turion II Ultra M660 and Celeron G4930T share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Turion II Ultra M660 versus 3 GHz on the Celeron G4930T — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Celeron G4930T. The Turion II Ultra M660 uses the Caspian (2009) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron G4930T uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Turion II Ultra M660 scores 2,278 against the Celeron G4930T's 2,287 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron G4930T.
| Feature | Turion II Ultra M660 | Celeron G4930T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | — | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 512 kB |
| Process | 45 nm | 14 nm-69% |
| Architecture | Caspian (2009) | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) |
| PassMark | 2,278 | 2,287 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 599 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 927 |
Memory & Platform
The Turion II Ultra M660 uses the S1g3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G4930T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Turion II Ultra M660 versus DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G4930T — the Celeron G4930T supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G4930T supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Turion II Ultra M660) vs 16 (Celeron G4930T) — the Celeron G4930T offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Turion II Ultra M660 | Celeron G4930T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | S1g3 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | DDR4-2400+100% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 64 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Turion II Ultra M660) vs VT-x (Celeron G4930T). The Celeron G4930T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Turion II Ultra M660 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Turion II Ultra M660 targets Mobile, Celeron G4930T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G4930T rivals Pentium G5420T.
| Feature | Turion II Ultra M660 | Celeron G4930T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | UHD Graphics 610 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x |
| Target Use | Mobile | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Turion II Ultra M660 and Celeron G4930T
