Turion X2 RM-70 vs Xeon E5335

Turion X2 RM-70 vs Xeon E5335 Performance Spectrum

Turion X2 RM-70

2 / 2

1,556

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon E5335

4 / 4

1,549

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Turion X2 RM-70 vs Xeon E5335 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Turion X2 RM-70 vs Xeon E5335: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Turion X2 RM-70

2008

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 1W instead of 80W, a 79W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5335, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.

Xeon E5335

2006

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,549 vs 1,556).
❌7900% higher power demand at 80W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Turion X2 RM-70 better than Xeon E5335?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5335 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Turion X2 RM-70 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion X2 RM-70 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Turion X2 RM-70 still makes the most sense overall. Turion X2 RM-70 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Turion X2 RM-70 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2008 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Turion X2 RM-70 vs Xeon E5335 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Turion X2 RM-70

The Turion X2 RM-70 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Puma (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,556 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon E5335

The Xeon E5335 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Clovertown (2006−2007) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 1,549 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Turion X2 RM-70 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon E5335 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5335 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Turion X2 RM-70 versus 2 GHz on the Xeon E5335 — identical boost frequencies. The Turion X2 RM-70 uses the Puma (2008−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Xeon E5335 uses Clovertown (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Turion X2 RM-70 scores 1,556 against the Xeon E5335's 1,549 — a 0.5% lead for the Turion X2 RM-70. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Turion X2 RM-70 vs 8 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E5335.

Feature	Turion X2 RM-70	Xeon E5335
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2 GHz
Base Clock	—	2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	8 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB (total)+300%
Process	65 nm	65 nm
Architecture	Puma (2008−2009)	Clovertown (2006−2007)
PassMark	1,556	1,549

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Turion X2 RM-70 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5335 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.