Core i5-4200Y vs Turion X2 RM-70

Core i5-4200Y vs Turion X2 RM-70 Performance Spectrum

Core i5-4200Y

2 / 4

1,558

+0.1%

1,556

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-4200Y vs Turion X2 RM-70 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-4200Y vs Turion X2 RM-70: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-4200Y

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4200, while Turion X2 RM-70 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌51100% higher power demand at 512W vs 1W.

Turion X2 RM-70

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 512W, a 511W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,556 vs 1,558).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4200Y can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-4200Y better than Turion X2 RM-70?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Turion X2 RM-70 is ahead with a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4200Y pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4200Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-4200Y still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-4200Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-4200Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-4200Y vs Turion X2 RM-70 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4200Y

The Core i5-4200Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,558 points. Launch price was $297.

Turion X2 RM-70

The Turion X2 RM-70 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Puma (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,556 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-4200Y packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Turion X2 RM-70's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Core i5-4200Y versus 2 GHz on the Turion X2 RM-70 — a 5.1% clock advantage for the Turion X2 RM-70. The Core i5-4200Y uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Turion X2 RM-70 uses Puma (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4200Y scores 1,558 against the Turion X2 RM-70's 1,556 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i5-4200Y. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-4200Y vs 0 kB on the Turion X2 RM-70.

Feature	Core i5-4200Y	Turion X2 RM-70
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.9 GHz	2 GHz+5%
Base Clock	1.4 GHz	—
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB
Process	22 nm-66%	65 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Puma (2008−2009)
PassMark	1,558	1,556
Geekbench 6 Single	574	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4200Y uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Turion X2 RM-70 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-4200Y	Turion X2 RM-70
Socket	FCBGA1168	S1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, EPT (Core i5-4200Y) / not specified (Turion X2 RM-70). The Core i5-4200Y includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4200), while the Turion X2 RM-70 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4200Y targets Tablet/2-in-1. Direct competitor: Core i5-4200Y rivals A4-5150M.