Core 2 Duo E7300
VS
Core i5-4200Y

Core 2 Duo E7300 vs Core i5-4200Y

Intel

Core 2 Duo E7300

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.67 GHz2008
VS
Intel

Core i5-4200Y

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo E7300 is positioned at rank 969 and the Core i5-4200Y is on rank 211, so the Core i5-4200Y offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E7300

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
26665%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
25196%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
18294%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
5511%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
4366%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3819%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2187%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2159%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1966%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1965%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1943%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1891%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1865%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1857%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1840%
#969
Core 2 Duo E7300
MSRP: $133|Avg: $133
100%
#970
Core i3-540
MSRP: $133|Avg: $5
100%
#972
Phenom II X3 700e
MSRP: $125|Avg: $40
99%
#973
Core i5-760
MSRP: $230|Avg: $61
99%
#974
Core i3-7102E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $80
99%
#975
Core 2 Quad Q8400
MSRP: $183|Avg: $128
97%
#976
Pentium Dual-Core E2180
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
96%
#977
Pentium E2180
MSRP: $84|Avg: $15
96%
#978
Pentium Dual-Core E2140
MSRP: $74|Avg: $5
94%
#979
Core i7-960
MSRP: $309|Avg: $110
94%
#980
E1-1500
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
94%
#981
Core i5-2405S
MSRP: $309|Avg: $120
94%
#982
Celeron 420
MSRP: $39|Avg: $15
93%
#983
Athlon II X4 615e
MSRP: $186|Avg: $30
93%
#984
Athlon X2 BE-2350
MSRP: $90|Avg: $10
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-4200Y

#57
Ryzen AI 9 365
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
97%
#199
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
377%
#200
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
371%
#201
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
341%
#202
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
339%
#203
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
336%
#205
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
325%
#206
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
311%
#207
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
311%
#208
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
302%
#211
Core i5-4200Y
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i5-4200Y delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core 2 Duo E7300 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.2% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore 2 Duo E7300Core i5-4200Y
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($133)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore 2 Duo E7300Core i5-4200Y
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($133)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo E7300 and Core i5-4200Y

Intel

Core 2 Duo E7300

The Core 2 Duo E7300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 3 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,555 points. Launch price was $249.

Intel

Core i5-4200Y

The Core i5-4200Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,558 points. Launch price was $297.

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo E7300 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-4200Y's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.67 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E7300 versus 1.9 GHz on the Core i5-4200Y — a 33.7% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E7300 (base: 2.66 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). The Core 2 Duo E7300 uses the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-4200Y uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E7300 scores 1,555 against the Core i5-4200Y's 1,558 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i5-4200Y. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 412 vs 574, a 32.9% lead for the Core i5-4200Y that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E7300 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-4200Y.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E7300Core i5-4200Y
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.67 GHz+41%
1.9 GHz
Base Clock
2.66 GHz+90%
1.4 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
3 MB (total)+1100%
256K (per core)
Process
45 nm
22 nm-51%
Architecture
Wolfdale (2008−2010)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
1,555
1,558
Geekbench 6 Single
412
574+39%
Geekbench 6 Multi
725
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo E7300 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i5-4200Y uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Core 2 Duo E7300 versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i5-4200Y — the Core i5-4200Y supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-4200Y supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core 2 Duo E7300) vs 12 (Core i5-4200Y) — the Core 2 Duo E7300 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: P35,G33,G41,P45 (Core 2 Duo E7300) and HM86,HM87,QM87 (Core i5-4200Y).

FeatureCore 2 Duo E7300Core i5-4200Y
Socket
LGA775
FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-800
DDR3L-1600+50%
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
16 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+33%
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core 2 Duo E7300 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core 2 Duo E7300) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i5-4200Y). The Core i5-4200Y includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4200), while the Core 2 Duo E7300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo E7300 targets Legacy Desktop, Core i5-4200Y targets Tablet/2-in-1. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E7300 rivals Athlon II X2 245; Core i5-4200Y rivals A4-5150M.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E7300Core i5-4200Y
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
HD Graphics 4200
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
VT-x, EPT
Target Use
Legacy Desktop
Tablet/2-in-1