
Core 2 Duo E7300

Core 2 Duo T5600
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo E7300 is positioned at rank 969 and the Core 2 Duo T5600 is on rank 1179, so the Core 2 Duo E7300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E7300
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T5600
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Duo E7300 | Core 2 Duo T5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($133) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($241) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Duo E7300 | Core 2 Duo T5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+81%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($133) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($241) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo E7300 and Core 2 Duo T5600

Core 2 Duo E7300
The Core 2 Duo E7300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 3 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,555 points. Launch price was $249.

Core 2 Duo T5600
The Core 2 Duo T5600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 July 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 34 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,560 points. Launch price was $241.
Processing Power
Both the Core 2 Duo E7300 and Core 2 Duo T5600 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.67 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E7300 versus 1.83 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T5600 — a 37.3% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E7300 (base: 2.66 GHz vs 1.83 GHz). The Core 2 Duo E7300 uses the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T5600 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E7300 scores 1,555 against the Core 2 Duo T5600's 1,560 — a 0.3% lead for the Core 2 Duo T5600. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E7300 | Core 2 Duo T5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.67 GHz+46% | 1.83 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.66 GHz+45% | 1.83 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (total)+50% | 2 MB |
| Process | 45 nm-31% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Wolfdale (2008−2010) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| PassMark | 1,555 | 1,560 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 412 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 725 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo E7300 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core 2 Duo T5600 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR2-800 memory speed. The Core 2 Duo E7300 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core 2 Duo E7300) vs 0 (Core 2 Duo T5600) — the Core 2 Duo E7300 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: P35,G33,G41,P45 (Core 2 Duo E7300) and 945GM,945PM (Core 2 Duo T5600).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E7300 | Core 2 Duo T5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Core 2 Duo E7300) / not specified (Core 2 Duo T5600). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo E7300 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E7300 rivals Athlon II X2 245.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E7300 | Core 2 Duo T5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Legacy Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core 2 Duo E7300 launched at $133 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo T5600 debuted at $241.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E7300 | Core 2 Duo T5600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $133-45% | $241 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $133 | — |
| Release Date | 2008 | 2006 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















