Core 2 Duo E7300 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-62

Core 2 Duo E7300 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-62 Performance Spectrum

Core 2 Duo E7300

2 / 2

1,555

0.0%

1,559

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Duo E7300 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-62 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Duo E7300 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-62: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Duo E7300

2008

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Turion 64 X2 TL-62.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,555 vs 1,559).
❌Launch MSRP is still $133 MSRP, while Turion 64 X2 TL-62 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌6400% higher power demand at 65W vs 1W.

Turion 64 X2 TL-62

2007

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 1W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core 2 Duo E7300.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 2 Duo E7300 better than Turion 64 X2 TL-62?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core 2 Duo E7300 is ahead with a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Turion 64 X2 TL-62 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion 64 X2 TL-62 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 2 Duo E7300 is the better buy right now. Core 2 Duo E7300 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $133 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Turion 64 X2 TL-62 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.3% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (11.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core 2 Duo E7300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2008 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core 2 Duo E7300 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-62 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo E7300

The Core 2 Duo E7300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 3 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,555 points. Launch price was $249.

Turion 64 X2 TL-62

The Turion 64 X2 TL-62 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Tyler (2007−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,559 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Duo E7300 and Turion 64 X2 TL-62 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.67 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E7300 versus 2.1 GHz on the Turion 64 X2 TL-62 — a 23.9% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E7300. The Core 2 Duo E7300 uses the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-62 uses Tyler (2007−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E7300 scores 1,555 against the Turion 64 X2 TL-62's 1,559 — a 0.3% lead for the Turion 64 X2 TL-62.

Feature	Core 2 Duo E7300	Turion 64 X2 TL-62
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.67 GHz+27%	2.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.66 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	3 MB (total)+200%	1 MB
Process	45 nm-31%	65 nm
Architecture	Wolfdale (2008−2010)	Tyler (2007−2009)
PassMark	1,555	1,559
Geekbench 6 Single	412	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	725	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Core 2 Duo E7300) / not specified (Turion 64 X2 TL-62). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo E7300 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E7300 rivals Athlon II X2 245.