Celeron 4305U vs Core i5-4200Y

Intel

Celeron 4305U

2 Cores2 Thrd15 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2019
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i5-4200Y

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······

Celeron 4305U vs Core i5-4200Y Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 4305U vs Core i5-4200Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 4305U vs Core i5-4200Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 4305U

2019

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 512W, a 497W reduction.
  • 33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
  • Launch MSRP is still $107 MSRP, while Core i5-4200Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i5-4200Y

2013

Why buy it

  • +50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,558 vs 1,562).
  • 3313.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 4305U better than Core i5-4200Y?
Yes. Celeron 4305U is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Celeron 4305U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 4305U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Celeron 4305U is the better buy right now. Celeron 4305U comes in at an unclear MSRP at $107 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (14.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron 4305U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 4305U vs Core i5-4200Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron 4305U

The Celeron 4305U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,562 points. Launch price was $107.

Intel

Core i5-4200Y

The Core i5-4200Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,558 points. Launch price was $297.

Processing Power

The Celeron 4305U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-4200Y's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Celeron 4305U versus 1.9 GHz on the Core i5-4200Y — a 14.6% clock advantage for the Celeron 4305U (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). The Celeron 4305U uses the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-4200Y uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 4305U scores 1,562 against the Core i5-4200Y's 1,558 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron 4305U. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 4305U vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-4200Y.

FeatureCeleron 4305UCore i5-4200Y
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz+16%
1.9 GHz
Base Clock
2.2 GHz+57%
1.4 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
3 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
1,562
1,558
Geekbench 6 Single
574
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 4305U uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4200Y uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2133 on the Celeron 4305U versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i5-4200Y — the Celeron 4305U supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 4305U supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron 4305U) vs 12 (Core i5-4200Y) — the Celeron 4305U offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Whiskey Lake-U (Celeron 4305U) and HM86,HM87,QM87 (Core i5-4200Y).

FeatureCeleron 4305UCore i5-4200Y
Socket
FCBGA1528
FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
2133+33%
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB+300%
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
16+33%
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Celeron 4305U) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i5-4200Y). Both include integrated graphics Intel UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron 4305U) and HD Graphics 4200 (Core i5-4200Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 4305U targets Budget, Core i5-4200Y targets Tablet/2-in-1. Direct competitor: Celeron 4305U rivals Pentium Gold 5405U; Core i5-4200Y rivals A4-5150M.

FeatureCeleron 4305UCore i5-4200Y
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 4200
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
VT-x, EPT
Target Use
Budget
Tablet/2-in-1