Celeron 4305U vs Phenom X4 9500

Intel

Celeron 4305U

2 Cores2 Thrd15 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2019
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Phenom X4 9500

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2007
Similar parts
·······

Celeron 4305U vs Phenom X4 9500 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 4305U vs Phenom X4 9500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 4305U vs Phenom X4 9500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 4305U

2019

Why buy it

  • Costs $140 less on MSRP ($107 MSRP vs $247 MSRP).
  • Delivers 130.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.6 vs 6.3 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $247 MSRP).
  • Draws 15W instead of 95W, a 80W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 610, while Phenom X4 9500 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,562 vs 1,564).

Phenom X4 9500

2007

Why buy it

  • +0.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 14.6 PassMark/$ ($247 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
  • 533.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 15W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Celeron 4305U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Phenom X4 9500 better than Celeron 4305U?
Yes. Phenom X4 9500 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Phenom X4 9500 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Phenom X4 9500 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Phenom X4 9500 comes in 130.8% more expensive on MSRP at $247 MSRP versus $107 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% higher PassMark. Celeron 4305U only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron 4305U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 4305U vs Phenom X4 9500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron 4305U

The Celeron 4305U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,562 points. Launch price was $107.

AMD

Phenom X4 9500

The Phenom X4 9500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Agena (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,564 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Celeron 4305U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom X4 9500 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom X4 9500 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Celeron 4305U versus 2.2 GHz on the Phenom X4 9500 — identical boost frequencies. The Celeron 4305U uses the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Phenom X4 9500 uses Agena (2007−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 4305U scores 1,562 against the Phenom X4 9500's 1,564 — a 0.1% lead for the Phenom X4 9500. Both processors carry 2 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCeleron 4305UPhenom X4 9500
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz
2.2 GHz
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512 kB (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm-78%
65 nm
Architecture
Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)
Agena (2007−2008)
PassMark
1,562
1,564
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 4305U uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom X4 9500 uses AM2+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron 4305UPhenom X4 9500
Socket
FCBGA1528
AM2+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
2133
Max RAM Capacity
64
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Celeron 4305U) / not specified (Phenom X4 9500). The Celeron 4305U includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 610), while the Phenom X4 9500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 4305U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 4305U rivals Pentium Gold 5405U.

FeatureCeleron 4305UPhenom X4 9500
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics 610
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 4305U was priced at $107, while the Phenom X4 9500 came in at $247. On launch pricing ($107 vs $247), Celeron 4305U was $140 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 4305U delivers 14.6 pts/$ vs 6.3 pts/$ for the Phenom X4 9500 — making the Celeron 4305U the 79% better value option.

FeatureCeleron 4305UPhenom X4 9500
MSRP
$107-57%
$247
Performance per Dollar
14.6+132%
6.3
Release Date
2019
2007

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.