
Celeron 4305U

Phenom X4 9500
Celeron 4305U vs Phenom X4 9500 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron 4305U vs Phenom X4 9500 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron 4305U vs Phenom X4 9500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron 4305U
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $140 less on MSRP ($107 MSRP vs $247 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 130.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.6 vs 6.3 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $247 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 95W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 610, while Phenom X4 9500 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,562 vs 1,564).
Phenom X4 9500
2007Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 14.6 PassMark/$ ($247 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
- ❌533.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 4305U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Phenom X4 9500 better than Celeron 4305U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron 4305U vs Phenom X4 9500 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 4305U
The Celeron 4305U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,562 points. Launch price was $107.

Phenom X4 9500
The Phenom X4 9500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Agena (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,564 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Celeron 4305U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom X4 9500 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom X4 9500 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Celeron 4305U versus 2.2 GHz on the Phenom X4 9500 — identical boost frequencies. The Celeron 4305U uses the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Phenom X4 9500 uses Agena (2007−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 4305U scores 1,562 against the Phenom X4 9500's 1,564 — a 0.1% lead for the Phenom X4 9500. Both processors carry 2 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Celeron 4305U | Phenom X4 9500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm-78% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) | Agena (2007−2008) |
| PassMark | 1,562 | 1,564 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 4305U uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom X4 9500 uses AM2+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron 4305U | Phenom X4 9500 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1528 | AM2+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2133 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Celeron 4305U) / not specified (Phenom X4 9500). The Celeron 4305U includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 610), while the Phenom X4 9500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 4305U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 4305U rivals Pentium Gold 5405U.
| Feature | Celeron 4305U | Phenom X4 9500 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron 4305U was priced at $107, while the Phenom X4 9500 came in at $247. On launch pricing ($107 vs $247), Celeron 4305U was $140 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 4305U delivers 14.6 pts/$ vs 6.3 pts/$ for the Phenom X4 9500 — making the Celeron 4305U the 79% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron 4305U | Phenom X4 9500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $107-57% | $247 |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.6+132% | 6.3 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2007 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















