PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 4305U vs Celeron G1830 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 4305U vs Celeron G1830: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 4305U

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 54W, a 39W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.6 vs 30.0 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $52 MSRP).

Celeron G1830

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $55 less on MSRP ($52 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
✅Delivers 105.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.0 vs 14.6 PassMark/$ ($52 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,560 vs 1,562).
❌260% higher power demand at 54W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 4305U better than Celeron G1830?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron G1830 is ahead with a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 4305U pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 4305U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 4305U is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron 4305U comes in 105.8% more expensive on MSRP at $107 MSRP versus $52 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark. Celeron G1830 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 105.5% better value on paper (30.0 vs 14.6 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1150.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 4305U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 4305U vs Celeron G1830 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 4305U

The Celeron 4305U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,562 points. Launch price was $107.

Celeron G1830

The Celeron G1830 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,560 points. Launch price was $85.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 4305U and Celeron G1830 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Celeron 4305U versus 2.8 GHz on the Celeron G1830 — a 24% clock advantage for the Celeron G1830 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Celeron 4305U uses the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron G1830 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 4305U scores 1,562 against the Celeron G1830's 1,560 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron 4305U. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 4305U vs 2 MB on the Celeron G1830.

Feature	Celeron 4305U	Celeron G1830
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz	2.8 GHz+27%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.8 GHz+27%
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	2 MB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,562	1,560
Geekbench 6 Single	—	496
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	910

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 4305U uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G1830 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2133 on the Celeron 4305U versus DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G1830 — the Celeron 4305U supports 60% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 4305U supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Whiskey Lake-U (Celeron 4305U) and H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Celeron G1830).

Feature	Celeron 4305U	Celeron G1830
Socket	FCBGA1528	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	2133+60%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+100%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Celeron 4305U) vs VT-x (Celeron G1830). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron 4305U) and HD Graphics (Haswell) (Celeron G1830) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 4305U targets Budget, Celeron G1830 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 4305U rivals Pentium Gold 5405U; Celeron G1830 rivals Pentium G3220.

Feature	Celeron 4305U	Celeron G1830
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 610	HD Graphics (Haswell)
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	true	VT-x
Target Use	Budget	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 4305U was priced at $107, while the Celeron G1830 came in at $52. On launch pricing ($107 vs $52), Celeron G1830 was $55 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 4305U delivers 14.6 pts/$ vs 30.0 pts/$ for the Celeron G1830 — making the Celeron G1830 the 69.1% better value option.

Feature	Celeron 4305U	Celeron G1830
MSRP	$107	$52-51%
Performance per Dollar	14.6	30.0+105%
Release Date	2019	2013

Search Celeron 4305U on Amazon

Search Celeron G1830 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.