Celeron 4305U vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85
Celeron 4305U
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 4305U is positioned at rank 109 and the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 is on rank 413, so the Celeron 4305U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 4305U
Performance Per Dollar Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron 4305U | Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($107) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Puma (2008−2009) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron 4305U | Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($107) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 4305U and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85
Celeron 4305U
The Celeron 4305U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,562 points. Launch price was $107.
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85
The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Puma (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1g2. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,585 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron 4305U and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Celeron 4305U versus 2.3 GHz on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 — a 4.4% clock advantage for the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85. The Celeron 4305U uses the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 uses Puma (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 4305U scores 1,562 against the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85's 1,585 — a 1.5% lead for the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 4305U vs 0 kB on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85.
| Feature | Celeron 4305U | Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.3 GHz+5% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 2 MB+700% |
| Process | 14 nm-78% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) | Puma (2008−2009) |
| PassMark | 1,562 | 1,585+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 4305U uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 uses S1g2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron 4305U | Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1528 | S1g2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2133 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Celeron 4305U) / not specified (Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85). The Celeron 4305U includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 610), while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 4305U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 4305U rivals Pentium Gold 5405U.
| Feature | Celeron 4305U | Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron 4305U and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85
