
Core i3-540 vs Turion X2 RM-70

Core i3-540

Turion X2 RM-70
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-540 is positioned at rank 970 and the Turion X2 RM-70 is on rank 424, so the Turion X2 RM-70 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-540
Performance Per Dollar Turion X2 RM-70
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i3-540 | Turion X2 RM-70 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($5) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Clarkdale (2010−2011) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Puma (2008−2009) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i3-540 | Turion X2 RM-70 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($5) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-540 and Turion X2 RM-70

Core i3-540
The Core i3-540 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 0.07 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,554 points. Launch price was $45.

Turion X2 RM-70
The Turion X2 RM-70 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Puma (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,556 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i3-540 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Turion X2 RM-70's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 0.07 GHz on the Core i3-540 versus 2 GHz on the Turion X2 RM-70 — a 186.5% clock advantage for the Turion X2 RM-70. The Core i3-540 uses the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Turion X2 RM-70 uses Puma (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-540 scores 1,554 against the Turion X2 RM-70's 1,556 — a 0.1% lead for the Turion X2 RM-70. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-540 vs 0 kB on the Turion X2 RM-70.
| Feature | Core i3-540 | Turion X2 RM-70 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 0.07 GHz | 2 GHz+2757% |
| Base Clock | 3.06 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 1 MB+300% |
| Process | 32 nm-51% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Clarkdale (2010−2011) | Puma (2008−2009) |
| PassMark | 1,554 | 1,556 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-540 uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Turion X2 RM-70 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-540 | Turion X2 RM-70 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1156 | S1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















