
Celeron G1830

Core i3-540
Celeron G1830 vs Core i3-540 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron G1830 vs Core i3-540 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron G1830 vs Core i3-540: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron G1830
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $81 less on MSRP ($52 MSRP vs $133 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 156.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.0 vs 11.7 PassMark/$ ($52 MSRP vs $133 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 54W instead of 73W, a 19W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Haswell), while Core i3-540 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 4 MB).
Core i3-540
2010Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,554 vs 1,560).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.7 vs 30.0 PassMark/$ ($133 MSRP vs $52 MSRP).
- ❌35.2% higher power demand at 73W vs 54W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G1830 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron G1830 better than Core i3-540?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G1830 vs Core i3-540 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G1830
The Celeron G1830 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,560 points. Launch price was $85.

Core i3-540
The Core i3-540 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 0.07 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,554 points. Launch price was $45.
Processing Power
The Celeron G1830 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-540's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Celeron G1830 versus 0.07 GHz on the Core i3-540 — a 190.2% clock advantage for the Celeron G1830 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.06 GHz). The Celeron G1830 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i3-540 uses Clarkdale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1830 scores 1,560 against the Core i3-540's 1,554 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron G1830. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron G1830 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-540.
| Feature | Celeron G1830 | Core i3-540 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz+3900% | 0.07 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.06 GHz+9% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Clarkdale (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,560 | 1,554 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 496 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 910 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G1830 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-540 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron G1830 | Core i3-540 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | LGA1156 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G1830) / not specified (Core i3-540). The Celeron G1830 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Core i3-540 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1830 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1830 rivals Pentium G3220.
| Feature | Celeron G1830 | Core i3-540 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics (Haswell) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron G1830 was priced at $52, while the Core i3-540 came in at $133. On launch pricing ($52 vs $133), Celeron G1830 was $81 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G1830 delivers 30.0 pts/$ vs 11.7 pts/$ for the Core i3-540 — making the Celeron G1830 the 87.9% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G1830 | Core i3-540 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $52-61% | $133 |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.0+156% | 11.7 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














