
Celeron G1830

Phenom X4 9500
Celeron G1830 vs Phenom X4 9500 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron G1830 vs Phenom X4 9500 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron G1830 vs Phenom X4 9500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron G1830
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $195 less on MSRP ($52 MSRP vs $247 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 373.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.0 vs 6.3 PassMark/$ ($52 MSRP vs $247 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 54W instead of 95W, a 41W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Haswell), while Phenom X4 9500 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,560 vs 1,564).
Phenom X4 9500
2007Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 30.0 PassMark/$ ($247 MSRP vs $52 MSRP).
- ❌75.9% higher power demand at 95W vs 54W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G1830 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron G1830 better than Phenom X4 9500?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G1830 vs Phenom X4 9500 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G1830
The Celeron G1830 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,560 points. Launch price was $85.

Phenom X4 9500
The Phenom X4 9500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Agena (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,564 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Celeron G1830 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom X4 9500 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom X4 9500 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Celeron G1830 versus 2.2 GHz on the Phenom X4 9500 — a 24% clock advantage for the Celeron G1830. The Celeron G1830 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Phenom X4 9500 uses Agena (2007−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1830 scores 1,560 against the Phenom X4 9500's 1,564 — a 0.3% lead for the Phenom X4 9500. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron G1830 vs 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X4 9500.
| Feature | Celeron G1830 | Phenom X4 9500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz+27% | 2.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 22 nm-66% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Agena (2007−2008) |
| PassMark | 1,560 | 1,564 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 496 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 910 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G1830 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom X4 9500 uses AM2+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron G1830 | Phenom X4 9500 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | AM2+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G1830) / not specified (Phenom X4 9500). The Celeron G1830 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Phenom X4 9500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1830 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1830 rivals Pentium G3220.
| Feature | Celeron G1830 | Phenom X4 9500 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics (Haswell) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron G1830 was priced at $52, while the Phenom X4 9500 came in at $247. On launch pricing ($52 vs $247), Celeron G1830 was $195 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G1830 delivers 30.0 pts/$ vs 6.3 pts/$ for the Phenom X4 9500 — making the Celeron G1830 the 130.3% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G1830 | Phenom X4 9500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $52-79% | $247 |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.0+376% | 6.3 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2007 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















