Turion X2 RM-75
VS
Celeron G1630

Turion X2 RM-75 vs Celeron G1630

AMD

Turion X2 RM-75

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Celeron G1630

2 Cores2 Thrd55 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Turion X2 RM-75 is positioned at rank 366 and the Celeron G1630 is on rank 495, so the Turion X2 RM-75 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Turion X2 RM-75

#111
Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $180
99%
#354
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
513%
#355
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
505%
#356
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
464%
#357
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
462%
#358
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
457%
#360
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
442%
#361
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
424%
#362
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
423%
#363
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
411%
#366
Turion X2 RM-75
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#375
Pentium Dual Core T3200
MSRP: $64|Avg: $5
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G1630

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
7670%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
7248%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
5262%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1585%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1256%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1099%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
629%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
621%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
565%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
565%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
559%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
544%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
536%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
534%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
529%
#256
Ryzen 7 1700X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $60
96%
#371
Core 5 120UL
MSRP: $277|Avg: $270
96%
#372
Ryzen Embedded V3C14
MSRP: $305|Avg: $305
96%
#373
Core i7-9700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $276
95%
#495
Celeron G1630
MSRP: $42|Avg: $5
100%
#499
Pentium G4400
MSRP: $64|Avg: $85
98%
#501
Core i5-8600K
MSRP: $257|Avg: $100
97%
#506
Athlon II X4 651
MSRP: $92|Avg: $92
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron G1630 leads in gaming performance. However, the Turion X2 RM-75 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightTurion X2 RM-75Celeron G1630
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Lion (2008−2009) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightTurion X2 RM-75Celeron G1630
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Turion X2 RM-75 and Celeron G1630

AMD

Turion X2 RM-75

The Turion X2 RM-75 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lion (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,717 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Celeron G1630

The Celeron G1630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,707 points. Launch price was $80.

Processing Power

Both the Turion X2 RM-75 and Celeron G1630 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Turion X2 RM-75 versus 2.8 GHz on the Celeron G1630 — a 24% clock advantage for the Celeron G1630. The Turion X2 RM-75 uses the Lion (2008−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Celeron G1630 uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Turion X2 RM-75 scores 1,717 against the Celeron G1630's 1,707 — a 0.6% lead for the Turion X2 RM-75. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Turion X2 RM-75 vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G1630.

FeatureTurion X2 RM-75Celeron G1630
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz
2.8 GHz+27%
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
256 kB (per core)
Process
65 nm
22 nm-66%
Architecture
Lion (2008−2009)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
1,717
1,707
Geekbench 6 Single
386
Geekbench 6 Multi
635
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Turion X2 RM-75 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G1630 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureTurion X2 RM-75Celeron G1630
Socket
S1
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Turion X2 RM-75) / VT-x (Celeron G1630). The Celeron G1630 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Turion X2 RM-75 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1630 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1630 rivals Pentium G2030.

FeatureTurion X2 RM-75Celeron G1630
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget