Turion X2 RM-75 vs Xeon L5335

Turion X2 RM-75 vs Xeon L5335 Performance Spectrum

Turion X2 RM-75

2 / 2

1,717

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon L5335

4 / 4

1,737

+1.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Turion X2 RM-75 vs Xeon L5335 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Turion X2 RM-75 vs Xeon L5335: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Turion X2 RM-75

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 50W, a 49W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,717 vs 1,737).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon L5335, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.

Xeon L5335

2007

Why buy it

✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $380 MSRP, while Turion X2 RM-75 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌4900% higher power demand at 50W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Turion X2 RM-75 better than Xeon L5335?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon L5335 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Turion X2 RM-75 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon L5335 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Turion X2 RM-75 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon L5335 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Turion X2 RM-75 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $380 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon L5335 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.2% better PassMark. Xeon L5335 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (4.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Turion X2 RM-75 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Turion X2 RM-75 vs Xeon L5335 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Turion X2 RM-75

The Turion X2 RM-75 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lion (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,717 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon L5335

The Xeon L5335 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 August 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Clovertown (2006−2007) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 50 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 1,737 points. Launch price was $380.

⚡

Processing Power

The Turion X2 RM-75 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon L5335 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon L5335 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Turion X2 RM-75 versus 2 GHz on the Xeon L5335 — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Turion X2 RM-75. The Turion X2 RM-75 uses the Lion (2008−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Xeon L5335 uses Clovertown (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Turion X2 RM-75 scores 1,717 against the Xeon L5335's 1,737 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon L5335. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Turion X2 RM-75 vs 8 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon L5335.

Feature	Turion X2 RM-75	Xeon L5335
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz+10%	2 GHz
Base Clock	—	2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	8 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB (total)+300%
Process	65 nm	65 nm
Architecture	Lion (2008−2009)	Clovertown (2006−2007)
PassMark	1,717	1,737+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Turion X2 RM-75 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon L5335 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.