
Core 2 Duo T5750
Popular choices:

Turion X2 RM-75
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core 2 Duo T5750
2008Why buy it
- ✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌100% higher power demand at 2W vs 1W.
Turion X2 RM-75
2009Why buy it
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 2W, a 1W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,717 vs 1,738).
Core 2 Duo T5750
2008Turion X2 RM-75
2009Why buy it
- ✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 2W, a 1W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌100% higher power demand at 2W vs 1W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,717 vs 1,738).
Quick Answers
So, is Turion X2 RM-75 better than Core 2 Duo T5750?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core 2 Duo T5750 | Turion X2 RM-75 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 31 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core 2 Duo T5750 | Turion X2 RM-75 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 40 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 36 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 31 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core 2 Duo T5750 | Turion X2 RM-75 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core 2 Duo T5750 | Turion X2 RM-75 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo T5750 and Turion X2 RM-75

Core 2 Duo T5750
Core 2 Duo T5750
The Core 2 Duo T5750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,738 points. Launch price was $249.

Turion X2 RM-75
Turion X2 RM-75
The Turion X2 RM-75 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lion (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,717 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Core 2 Duo T5750 and Turion X2 RM-75 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T5750 versus 2.2 GHz on the Turion X2 RM-75 — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Turion X2 RM-75. The Core 2 Duo T5750 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Turion X2 RM-75 uses Lion (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T5750 scores 1,738 against the Turion X2 RM-75's 1,717 — a 1.2% lead for the Core 2 Duo T5750. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T5750 vs 0 kB on the Turion X2 RM-75.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T5750 | Turion X2 RM-75 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz+10% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB L2 Cache | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
| Process | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Merom (2006−2008) | Lion (2008−2009) |
| PassMark | 1,738+1% | 1,717 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 360 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 680 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo T5750 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Turion X2 RM-75 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T5750 | Turion X2 RM-75 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | S1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-667 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: None (Core 2 Duo T5750) / not specified (Turion X2 RM-75). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T5750 targets Legacy Laptop.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T5750 | Turion X2 RM-75 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | None | — |
| Target Use | Legacy Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













