Athlon 64 X2 5800+
VS
Core 2 Duo T5750

Athlon 64 X2 5800+ vs Core 2 Duo T5750

AMD

Athlon 64 X2 5800+

2 Cores2 Thrd89 WWMax: 3 GHz2008
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo T5750

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ is positioned at rank 1037 and the Core 2 Duo T5750 is on rank 28, so the Core 2 Duo T5750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 X2 5800+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
41069%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
38806%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
28177%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
8488%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
6724%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
5882%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3369%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3325%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
3027%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
3027%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2993%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2913%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2872%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2860%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2834%
#1037
Athlon 64 X2 5800+
MSRP: $230|Avg: $20
100%
#1038
Phenom II X2 B53
MSRP: $150|Avg: $15
100%
#1039
Core 2 Quad Q9300
MSRP: $266|Avg: $27
100%
#1040
Athlon II X4 638
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
99%
#1041
Core 2 Duo E7200
MSRP: $133|Avg: $133
99%
#1043
Phenom X3 8750
MSRP: $195|Avg: $20
98%
#1044
Pentium G4400TE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $250
96%
#1045
Celeron 2.60
MSRP: $53|Avg: $10
96%
#1046
Core i7-990X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $225
94%
#1047
Phenom X4 9750B
MSRP: $215|Avg: $34
93%
#1048
Core 2 Duo E8200
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
92%
#1049
Core 2 Quad Q9450
MSRP: $316|Avg: $15
92%
#1050
Core 2 Duo E8600
MSRP: $200|Avg: $95
91%
#1051
Core 2 Duo E6320
MSRP: $163|Avg: $5
90%
#1052
Core i7-980X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $150
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T5750

#16
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
169%
#17
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
166%
#18
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
153%
#19
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
152%
#20
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
151%
#22
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
145%
#23
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
139%
#24
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
139%
#25
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
136%
#28
Core 2 Duo T5750
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $8
100%
#29
Core 2 Duo T7200
MSRP: $286|Avg: $6
99%
#30
Core i5-3230M
MSRP: $225|Avg: $13
98%
#31
Atom D525
MSRP: $63|Avg: N/A
98%
#32
Atom x7835RE
MSRP: $127|Avg: N/A
98%
#33
Core 2 Duo P8400
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
96%
#38
Core 2 Duo T8100
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
89%
#39
Atom 330
MSRP: $43|Avg: $30
88%
#43
Core 2 Duo SU7300
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core 2 Duo T5750 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightAthlon 64 X2 5800+Core 2 Duo T5750
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
More affordable ($8)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Brisbane (2007−2008) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Core 2 Duo T5750 holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $8 (vs $20), it costs 60% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 149% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Athlon 64 X2 5800+.
InsightAthlon 64 X2 5800+Core 2 Duo T5750
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+149%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
More affordable ($8)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 X2 5800+ and Core 2 Duo T5750

AMD

Athlon 64 X2 5800+

The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,745 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core 2 Duo T5750

The Core 2 Duo T5750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,738 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ and Core 2 Duo T5750 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ versus 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T5750 — a 40% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 5800+. The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ uses the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T5750 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ scores 1,745 against the Core 2 Duo T5750's 1,738 — a 0.4% lead for the Athlon 64 X2 5800+. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ vs 2 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T5750.

FeatureAthlon 64 X2 5800+Core 2 Duo T5750
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3 GHz+50%
2 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
2 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
512 kB
2 MB+300%
Process
65 nm
65 nm
Architecture
Brisbane (2007−2008)
Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark
1,745
1,738
Geekbench 6 Single
360
Geekbench 6 Multi
680
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo T5750 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR2-800 memory speed. The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 X2 5800+) and GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T5750).

FeatureAthlon 64 X2 5800+Core 2 Duo T5750
Socket
AM2
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-800
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+300%
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon 64 X2 5800+) / None (Core 2 Duo T5750). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T5750 targets Legacy Laptop.

FeatureAthlon 64 X2 5800+Core 2 Duo T5750
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
None
Target Use
Legacy Laptop
💰

Value Analysis

At current prices ($20 vs $8), the Core 2 Duo T5750 is $12 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ delivers 87.3 pts/$ vs 217.3 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo T5750 — making the Core 2 Duo T5750 the 85.4% better value option.

FeatureAthlon 64 X2 5800+Core 2 Duo T5750
MSRP
$230
Avg Price (30d)
$20
$8-60%
Performance per Dollar
87.3
217.3+149%
Release Date
2008
2008