
Athlon 64 X2 5800+

Core 2 Duo T5750
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ is positioned at rank 1037 and the Core 2 Duo T5750 is on rank 28, so the Core 2 Duo T5750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 X2 5800+
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T5750
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon 64 X2 5800+ | Core 2 Duo T5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) | ✅ More affordable ($8) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Brisbane (2007−2008) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon 64 X2 5800+ | Core 2 Duo T5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+149%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) | ✅ More affordable ($8) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 X2 5800+ and Core 2 Duo T5750

Athlon 64 X2 5800+
The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,745 points. Launch price was $149.

Core 2 Duo T5750
The Core 2 Duo T5750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,738 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ and Core 2 Duo T5750 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ versus 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T5750 — a 40% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 5800+. The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ uses the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T5750 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ scores 1,745 against the Core 2 Duo T5750's 1,738 — a 0.4% lead for the Athlon 64 X2 5800+. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ vs 2 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T5750.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 5800+ | Core 2 Duo T5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz+50% | 2 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 2 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 2 MB+300% |
| Process | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Brisbane (2007−2008) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| PassMark | 1,745 | 1,738 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 360 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 680 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo T5750 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR2-800 memory speed. The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 X2 5800+) and GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T5750).
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 5800+ | Core 2 Duo T5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM2 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+300% | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon 64 X2 5800+) / None (Core 2 Duo T5750). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T5750 targets Legacy Laptop.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 5800+ | Core 2 Duo T5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | None |
| Target Use | — | Legacy Laptop |
Value Analysis
At current prices ($20 vs $8), the Core 2 Duo T5750 is $12 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ delivers 87.3 pts/$ vs 217.3 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo T5750 — making the Core 2 Duo T5750 the 85.4% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 5800+ | Core 2 Duo T5750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $230 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $8-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 87.3 | 217.3+149% |
| Release Date | 2008 | 2008 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.

















