
Athlon 64 X2 5800+

Xeon E5405
Athlon 64 X2 5800+ vs Xeon E5405 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon 64 X2 5800+ vs Xeon E5405 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon 64 X2 5800+ vs Xeon E5405: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon 64 X2 5800+
2008Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,745 vs 1,753).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5405, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 8.4 PassMark/$ ($230 MSRP vs $209 MSRP).
Xeon E5405
2007Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.
- ✅Costs $21 less on MSRP ($209 MSRP vs $230 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 10.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 8.4 vs 7.6 PassMark/$ ($209 MSRP vs $230 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 89W, a 9W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5405 better than Athlon 64 X2 5800+?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon 64 X2 5800+ vs Xeon E5405 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 X2 5800+
The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,745 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5405
The Xeon E5405 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 November 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 1,753 points. Launch price was $209.
Processing Power
The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon E5405 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5405 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ versus 2 GHz on the Xeon E5405 — a 40% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 5800+. The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ uses the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Xeon E5405 uses Harpertown (2007−2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ scores 1,745 against the Xeon E5405's 1,753 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E5405. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E5405.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 5800+ | Xeon E5405 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz+50% | 2 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 12 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 6 MB (total)+1100% |
| Process | 65 nm | 45 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Brisbane (2007−2008) | Harpertown (2007−2008) |
| PassMark | 1,745 | 1,753 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5405 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ versus DDR2-667 on the Xeon E5405 — the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ supports 19.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5405 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 5800+ | Xeon E5405 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM2 | LGA771 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800+20% | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon 64 X2 5800+) / VT-x (Xeon E5405). Primary use case: Xeon E5405 targets Server.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 5800+ | Xeon E5405 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ was priced at $230, while the Xeon E5405 came in at $209. On launch pricing ($230 vs $209), Xeon E5405 was $21 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ delivers 7.6 pts/$ vs 8.4 pts/$ for the Xeon E5405 — making the Xeon E5405 the 10% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 5800+ | Xeon E5405 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $230 | $209-9% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.6 | 8.4+11% |
| Release Date | 2008 | 2007 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















