Athlon 64 X2 5800+
Athlon II X3 440
Athlon 64 X2 5800+ vs Athlon II X3 440 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon 64 X2 5800+ vs Athlon II X3 440 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon 64 X2 5800+ vs Athlon II X3 440: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon 64 X2 5800+
2008Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 89W instead of 95W, a 6W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 23.2 PassMark/$ ($230 MSRP vs $75 MSRP).
Athlon II X3 440
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $155 less on MSRP ($75 MSRP vs $230 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 206.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 23.2 vs 7.6 PassMark/$ ($75 MSRP vs $230 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,743 vs 1,745).
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon 64 X2 5800+ better than Athlon II X3 440?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon 64 X2 5800+ vs Athlon II X3 440 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Athlon 64 X2 5800+
The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,745 points. Launch price was $149.
Athlon II X3 440
The Athlon II X3 440 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Rana (2009−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,743 points. Launch price was $47.
Processing Power
The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Athlon II X3 440 offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the Athlon II X3 440 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ versus 3 GHz on the Athlon II X3 440 — identical boost frequencies. The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ uses the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Athlon II X3 440 uses Rana (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ scores 1,745 against the Athlon II X3 440's 1,743 — a 0.1% lead for the Athlon 64 X2 5800+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 5800+ | Athlon II X3 440 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 3 / 3+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 65 nm | 45 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Brisbane (2007−2008) | Rana (2009−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,745 | 1,743 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon II X3 440 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ versus DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X3 440 — the Athlon II X3 440 supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon II X3 440 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 X2 5800+) and AMD AM3 (Athlon II X3 440).
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 5800+ | Athlon II X3 440 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM2 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | DDR3-1333+67% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ was priced at $230, while the Athlon II X3 440 came in at $75. On launch pricing ($230 vs $75), Athlon II X3 440 was $155 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ delivers 7.6 pts/$ vs 23.2 pts/$ for the Athlon II X3 440 — making the Athlon II X3 440 the 101.6% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 5800+ | Athlon II X3 440 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $230 | $75-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.6 | 23.2+205% |
| Release Date | 2008 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon 64 X2 5800+ and Athlon II X3 440
