
Athlon 64 X2 5800+

Turion X2 RM-74
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ is positioned at rank 1037 and the Turion X2 RM-74 is on rank 355, so the Turion X2 RM-74 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 X2 5800+
Performance Per Dollar Turion X2 RM-74
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon 64 X2 5800+ | Turion X2 RM-74 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Brisbane (2007−2008) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Lion (2008−2009) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon 64 X2 5800+ | Turion X2 RM-74 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 X2 5800+ and Turion X2 RM-74

Athlon 64 X2 5800+
The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,745 points. Launch price was $149.

Turion X2 RM-74
The Turion X2 RM-74 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lion (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,740 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ and Turion X2 RM-74 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ versus 2.2 GHz on the Turion X2 RM-74 — a 30.8% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 5800+. The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ uses the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Turion X2 RM-74 uses Lion (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ scores 1,745 against the Turion X2 RM-74's 1,740 — a 0.3% lead for the Athlon 64 X2 5800+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 5800+ | Turion X2 RM-74 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz+36% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 1 MB+100% |
| Process | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Brisbane (2007−2008) | Lion (2008−2009) |
| PassMark | 1,745 | 1,740 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Turion X2 RM-74 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 5800+ | Turion X2 RM-74 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM2 | S1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.

















