Athlon 64 X2 5800+ vs Turion X2 RM-74

AMD

Athlon 64 X2 5800+

2 Cores2 Thrd89 WWMax: 3 GHz2008
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Turion X2 RM-74

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······

Athlon 64 X2 5800+ vs Turion X2 RM-74 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 X2 5800+ vs Turion X2 RM-74 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 X2 5800+ vs Turion X2 RM-74: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 X2 5800+

2008

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Launch MSRP is still $230 MSRP, while Turion X2 RM-74 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
    • 8800% higher power demand at 89W vs 1W.

    Turion X2 RM-74

    2009

    Why buy it

    • Draws 1W instead of 89W, a 88W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (1,740 vs 1,745).

    Quick Answers

    So, is Athlon 64 X2 5800+ better than Turion X2 RM-74?
    Yes. Athlon 64 X2 5800+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Athlon 64 X2 5800+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 64 X2 5800+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Athlon 64 X2 5800+ is the better buy right now. Athlon 64 X2 5800+ comes in at an unclear MSRP at $230 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Turion X2 RM-74 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Athlon 64 X2 5800+ vs Turion X2 RM-74 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    Athlon 64 X2 5800+

    The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,745 points. Launch price was $149.

    AMD

    Turion X2 RM-74

    The Turion X2 RM-74 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lion (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,740 points. Launch price was $69.

    Processing Power

    Both the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ and Turion X2 RM-74 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ versus 2.2 GHz on the Turion X2 RM-74 — a 30.8% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 5800+. The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ uses the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Turion X2 RM-74 uses Lion (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ scores 1,745 against the Turion X2 RM-74's 1,740 — a 0.3% lead for the Athlon 64 X2 5800+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

    FeatureAthlon 64 X2 5800+Turion X2 RM-74
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 2
    2 / 2
    Boost Clock
    3 GHz+36%
    2.2 GHz
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    512 kB
    1 MB+100%
    Process
    65 nm
    65 nm
    Architecture
    Brisbane (2007−2008)
    Lion (2008−2009)
    PassMark
    1,745
    1,740
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Turion X2 RM-74 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureAthlon 64 X2 5800+Turion X2 RM-74
    Socket
    AM2
    S1
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 2.0
    PCIe 2.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR2-800
    Max RAM Capacity
    16 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    0