A10-5745M vs Athlon 64 X2 5800+
A10-5745M
Athlon 64 X2 5800+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10-5745M is positioned at rank 709 and the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ is on rank 1037, so the A10-5745M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A10-5745M
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 X2 5800+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A10-5745M | Athlon 64 X2 5800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Brisbane (2007−2008) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A10-5745M | Athlon 64 X2 5800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A10-5745M and Athlon 64 X2 5800+
A10-5745M
The A10-5745M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,767 points. Launch price was $130.
Athlon 64 X2 5800+
The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,745 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The A10-5745M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10-5745M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the A10-5745M versus 3 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ — a 3.4% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 5800+. The A10-5745M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ uses Brisbane (2007−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A10-5745M scores 1,767 against the Athlon 64 X2 5800+'s 1,745 — a 1.3% lead for the A10-5745M. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | A10-5745M | Athlon 64 X2 5800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512 kB |
| Process | 32 nm-51% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Richland (2013−2014) | Brisbane (2007−2008) |
| PassMark | 1,767+1% | 1,745 |
Memory & Platform
The A10-5745M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ uses AM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the A10-5745M versus DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ — the A10-5745M supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A10-5745M) vs 0 (Athlon 64 X2 5800+) — the A10-5745M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP2 (A10-5745M) and AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 X2 5800+).
| Feature | A10-5745M | Athlon 64 X2 5800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP2 | AM2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1333+66550% | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 | 16 GB+104857500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (A10-5745M) / not specified (Athlon 64 X2 5800+). The A10-5745M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8610G), while the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A10-5745M rivals Core i3-4010U.
| Feature | A10-5745M | Athlon 64 X2 5800+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 8610G | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A10-5745M and Athlon 64 X2 5800+
