Athlon 64 X2 5800+ vs Athlon X2 L310

Athlon 64 X2 5800+ vs Athlon X2 L310 Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 X2 5800+

2 / 2

1,745

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon X2 L310

2 / 2

1,747

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 X2 5800+ vs Athlon X2 L310 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 X2 5800+ vs Athlon X2 L310: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 X2 5800+

2008

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,745 vs 1,747).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 17.5 PassMark/$ ($230 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌8800% higher power demand at 89W vs 1W.

Athlon X2 L310

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $230 MSRP).
✅Delivers 130.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.5 vs 7.6 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $230 MSRP).
✅Draws 1W instead of 89W, a 88W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon X2 L310 better than Athlon 64 X2 5800+?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon 64 X2 5800+ is ahead with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon X2 L310 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon X2 L310 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon X2 L310 is the better buy right now. Athlon X2 L310 comes in $130 cheaper on MSRP at $100 MSRP versus $230 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Athlon 64 X2 5800+ is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 130.3% better value on MSRP (17.5 vs 7.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon X2 L310 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon 64 X2 5800+ vs Athlon X2 L310 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 X2 5800+

The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,745 points. Launch price was $149.

Athlon X2 L310

The Athlon X2 L310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Conesus (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,747 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ and Athlon X2 L310 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ versus 1.2 GHz on the Athlon X2 L310 — a 85.7% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 5800+. The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ uses the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Athlon X2 L310 uses Conesus (2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ scores 1,745 against the Athlon X2 L310's 1,747 — a 0.1% lead for the Athlon X2 L310.

Feature	Athlon 64 X2 5800+	Athlon X2 L310
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3 GHz+150%	1.2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB	1 MB+100%
Process	65 nm	65 nm
Architecture	Brisbane (2007−2008)	Conesus (2009)
PassMark	1,745	1,747
Geekbench 6 Single	—	120
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	213

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon X2 L310 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ versus DDR2-667 on the Athlon X2 L310 — the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ supports 19.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 X2 5800+) and Socket S1 (Athlon X2 L310).

Feature	Athlon 64 X2 5800+	Athlon X2 L310
Socket	AM2	S1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800+20%	DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+300%	4 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon 64 X2 5800+) / Yes (Athlon X2 L310). Primary use case: Athlon X2 L310 targets Mobile.

Feature	Athlon 64 X2 5800+	Athlon X2 L310
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	Yes
Target Use	—	Mobile

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ was priced at $230, while the Athlon X2 L310 came in at $100. On launch pricing ($230 vs $100), Athlon X2 L310 was $130 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ delivers 7.6 pts/$ vs 17.5 pts/$ for the Athlon X2 L310 — making the Athlon X2 L310 the 78.9% better value option.

Feature	Athlon 64 X2 5800+	Athlon X2 L310
MSRP	$230	$100-57%
Performance per Dollar	7.6	17.5+130%
Release Date	2008	2009

Search Athlon 64 X2 5800+ on Amazon

Search Athlon X2 L310 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.