A10-4657M
Popular choices:
Core 2 Duo T5750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
A10-4657M
2013Why buy it
- ✅+25% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7660G, while Core 2 Duo T5750 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌100% higher power demand at 4W vs 2W.
Core 2 Duo T5750
2008Why buy it
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 4W, a 2W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (360 vs 450).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (680 vs 1,200).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A10-4657M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
A10-4657M
2013Core 2 Duo T5750
2008Why buy it
- ✅+25% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7660G, while Core 2 Duo T5750 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 4W, a 2W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌100% higher power demand at 4W vs 2W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (360 vs 450).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (680 vs 1,200).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A10-4657M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is A10-4657M better than Core 2 Duo T5750?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Path of Exile 2
| Preset | A10-4657M | Core 2 Duo T5750 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 31 FPS |
Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | A10-4657M | Core 2 Duo T5750 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 44 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 18 FPS |
League of Legends
| Preset | A10-4657M | Core 2 Duo T5750 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
Valorant
| Preset | A10-4657M | Core 2 Duo T5750 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A10-4657M and Core 2 Duo T5750
A10-4657M
A10-4657M
The A10-4657M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,759 points. Launch price was $130.
Core 2 Duo T5750
Core 2 Duo T5750
The Core 2 Duo T5750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,738 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
The A10-4657M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo T5750 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10-4657M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A10-4657M versus 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T5750 — a 46.2% clock advantage for the A10-4657M (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A10-4657M uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T5750 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A10-4657M scores 1,759 against the Core 2 Duo T5750's 1,738 — a 1.2% lead for the A10-4657M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 450 vs 360, a 22.2% lead for the A10-4657M that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,200 vs 680 (55.3% advantage for the A10-4657M).
| Feature | A10-4657M | Core 2 Duo T5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz+60% | 2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz+15% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 2 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Process | 32 nm-51% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Trinity (2012−2013) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| PassMark | 1,759+1% | 1,738 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 450+25% | 360 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,200+76% | 680 |
Memory & Platform
The A10-4657M uses the BGA socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo T5750 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A10-4657M versus DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T5750 — the A10-4657M supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10-4657M supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A10-4657M) vs 0 (Core 2 Duo T5750) — the A10-4657M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | A10-4657M | Core 2 Duo T5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600+50% | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+700% | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-4657M) vs None (Core 2 Duo T5750). The A10-4657M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7660G), while the Core 2 Duo T5750 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-4657M targets Laptop, Core 2 Duo T5750 targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-4657M rivals Core i3-2330M.
| Feature | A10-4657M | Core 2 Duo T5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 7660G | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | None |
| Target Use | Laptop | Legacy Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A10-4657M and Core 2 Duo T5750
