A10-7300 vs Core 2 Duo T5750

A10-7300 vs Core 2 Duo T5750 Performance Spectrum

A10-7300

4 / 4

1,736

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core 2 Duo T5750

2 / 2

1,738

+0.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-7300 vs Core 2 Duo T5750 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-7300 vs Core 2 Duo T5750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-7300

2014

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R6, while Core 2 Duo T5750 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,736 vs 1,738).
❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Core 2 Duo T5750 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌100% higher power demand at 4W vs 2W.

Core 2 Duo T5750

2008

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 2W instead of 4W, a 2W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while A10-7300 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-7300 better than Core 2 Duo T5750?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A10-7300 is ahead with a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo T5750 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo T5750 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-7300 is the better buy right now. A10-7300 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $150 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core 2 Duo T5750 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.1% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (11.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-7300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-7300 vs Core 2 Duo T5750 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-7300

The A10-7300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,736 points. Launch price was $130.

Core 2 Duo T5750

The Core 2 Duo T5750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,738 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-7300 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo T5750 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10-7300 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A10-7300 versus 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T5750 — a 46.2% clock advantage for the A10-7300 (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A10-7300 uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T5750 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A10-7300 scores 1,736 against the Core 2 Duo T5750's 1,738 — a 0.1% lead for the Core 2 Duo T5750.

Feature	A10-7300	Core 2 Duo T5750
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+60%	2 GHz
Base Clock	1.9 GHz	2 GHz+5%
L3 Cache	—	2 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	4096 kB+100%	2 MB
Process	28 nm-57%	65 nm
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark	1,736	1,738
Geekbench 6 Single	—	360
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	680

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-7300 uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo T5750 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A10-7300 versus DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T5750 — the A10-7300 supports 139.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10-7300 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A10-7300) vs 0 (Core 2 Duo T5750) — the A10-7300 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP3 (A10-7300) and GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T5750).

Feature	A10-7300	Core 2 Duo T5750
Socket	FP3	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+140%	DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+300%	4 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-7300) vs None (Core 2 Duo T5750). The A10-7300 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R6), while the Core 2 Duo T5750 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-7300 targets Laptop, Core 2 Duo T5750 targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-7300 rivals Core i3-4010U.